击碎记忆冠军现实的秘密遥视实验|尼尔森·德利斯The Secret Remote Viewing Experiment That Broke A Memory Champion's Reality | Nelson Dellis

YouTubeTHIRD EYE DROPS with Michael Phillip02:02:24
02:02:24

导读

  • 记忆冠军尼尔森·德利斯讲述自己如何被一家交易公司半公开地招募,参与用“关联遥视”预测市场涨跌的秘密项目。
  • 他从最初的强烈怀疑,到在训练中遇到难以解释的命中,并以 58% 左右的命中率和“鲸鱼跃出水面”的案例说明自己的动摇。
  • 对谈梳理了遥视、星门计划、斯坦福研究所、英戈·斯旺和乔·麦克莫尼格尔之间的关系,也保留了怀疑、确认偏误和样本量不足的问题。
  • 德利斯在门罗研究所参加 Gateway 静修时,尝试读取另一房间里的四位数,并经历了一次无法用普通出体感描述的体验。
  • 后半段进入记忆术、记忆宫殿、《Ars Notoria》和一万位圆周率,讨论记忆训练是否可能触及某种非局域的信息获取方式。

术语对照

原文 译名 说明
Nelson Dellis 尼尔森·德利斯 嘉宾,多次美国记忆冠军
Michael Phillip 迈克尔·菲利普 主持人
remote viewing 遥视 在感官范围之外获取目标信息的技术
Stargate Project 星门计划 美国军方研究遥视等能力的项目
SRI / Stanford Research Institute 斯坦福研究所 早期遥视研究机构
Ingo Swann 英戈·斯旺 遥视研究与推广中的关键人物
Joe McMoneagle 乔·麦克莫尼格尔 星门计划早期遥视员
Monroe Institute 门罗研究所 以 Gateway 静修和双脑同步音频闻名
Gateway Retreat Gateway 静修 门罗研究所的意识探索课程
Hemisync 双脑同步 门罗研究所使用的音频技术
associative remote viewing 关联遥视 将遥视结果映射到未来二选一结果的方法
memory palace 记忆宫殿 用熟悉空间和图像储存信息的记忆技术
Ars Notoria 《Ars Notoria》 中世纪记忆与仪式文本
Giordano Bruno 焦尔达诺·布鲁诺 文艺复兴时期哲学家与记忆术相关人物

01

记忆冠军被秘密招募How a Memory Champion Was Secretly Recruited

00:00:00 – 00:26:51

Nelson Dellis
[00:00:00]

这到底是怎么回事?太离谱了。我当时只是安安分分地做个记忆运动员,拿冠军、破纪录、教别人,那已经成了我的职业。结果我和一个人刚通话,他上来就问:“你听说过遥视吗?”我说没有。我大概听起来特别蠢,因为我是真的不知道。接着他又问我:“你听说过星门计划吗?”我才想起来,哦,好像某天晚上在 YouTube 上顺着一堆视频看过一点,但从没真正放在心上。

然后他开始解释那是什么、遥视又是什么。我的第一反应是:好吧,这是骗局。他接下来肯定会问我要钱,或者让我投资、参加个什么项目之类的。

What is going on here? This is wild. I was just minding my own business, being a memory guy, winning championships, breaking records, teaching people. It had become my career. I got on the call with a guy and right off the bat he said, "Have you ever heard of remote viewing?" And I was like, "No." I must have sounded so dumb. I didn't know. Then he asked me, "Have you heard of the Stargate program?" And I was like, "Yeah, I think I've heard about this." Maybe I went down some rabbit hole one night on YouTube, but it never really stuck with me.

He then started to go into what it means and what remote viewing is. My first instinct was like, "Okay, this is a scam. He's going to start asking me for money or something."

Nelson Dellis
[00:00:43]

但他没有。

But he didn't.

Michael Phillip
[00:00:44]

这个故事后面还有更多章节。你们后来去了门罗研究所,参加了 Gateway 静修,也有一些……我们就说是非常有意思的经历吧。

There are more chapters to this journey. You guys eventually go to Monroe Institute. You do the Gateway Retreat. You have some, let's just call them very interesting experiences.

Nelson Dellis
[00:00:55]

对。我到那里后,第一天还是最初几天,就对刚认识的一位朋友说:“嘿,我们各自回小房间之前,你写一个四位数,放在桌上。”她住楼上的房间,我在角落的房间。目标是试着飘过去看一眼。我整场练习都在试图感知那个数字。我记得前 30 分钟什么都没有,只是非常放松。后来我几乎放松到放弃了期待,那才开始看到一些让我一下警觉的东西。我先看到一堵墙,画面关掉又打开,我正看着一张木质书桌。

我能看到一张卡片,一张写着四位数的便签卡。

Yeah. When I got there, I one of the first days I said to a person that I had made friends with and I said, "Hey, before we go to our little CHEC unit, she was in an upstairs room. I was in the corner here. Write down a four-digit number, put it on your desk." And the goal being to go and try to float over there and see it. And my whole session was around trying to perceive that number. And I remember the first like must have been the first 30 minutes.

I'm just nothing. I'm very relaxed. It's like I and I almost like relaxed and let go of this expectation. And that's when I started to see like things that ping my ears where I saw kind of a wall and then it opened again and I was looking at a desk, a wooden desk

And I could see this card, this note card that had four digits on it.

Michael Phillip
[00:01:45]

尼尔森,你真的是我见过最聪明、最令人印象深刻的人之一。我知道你会否认,而这反而更说明这是真的。很多人不知道,你是多次美国记忆冠军;但除此之外,你还开始关注很多恰恰也是我核心兴趣的话题:心智、意识本身,以及这一切到底是怎么回事。尤其是,你有一段很疯狂的经历,从此对遥视产生了兴趣。今天一定会聊得很精彩。

Nelson, you're truly one of the most brilliant and impressive minds I've ever encountered. And I know that you're going to reject that, which makes it even more true. but for people that don't know, man, you're a multi-time US memory champion, but on top of that, you've become interested in a lot of things that I am like very very centrally interested in. the psi, what's going on with consciousness itself, all of this stuff.

And in particular, you have this like insane story about becoming interested in remote viewing. So, it's going to be a fabulous conversation, man.

Nelson Dellis
[00:02:23]

谢谢。首先,感谢你邀请我上节目,也很高兴最近能在克里斯的巡演上和你一起玩。谢谢你的夸奖。我也很想深入聊下去。你想从哪里开始?

Yeah. Well, first of all, thanks for having me on your show. It was a pleasure getting to hang with you recently on Chris's tour. but yeah, thanks for the compliments. and yeah, I would love to dive further into that. for your audience, where where do you want to start?

Michael Phillip
[00:02:38]

这绝对是实至名归。我想我们得从遥视开始,因为很多人也不知道,你和克里斯是很好的朋友。你们认识多久了?对了,你们是怎么认识的?

Yeah. No, it's truly well deserved, man. I think we have to start with remote viewing because also for people that don't know, you and Chris are really good friends. You've been friends for I don't How did you guys meet, by the way?

Nelson Dellis
[00:02:52]

这也算是整个故事的一部分。我其实已经接触过遥视……嗯,不,不对,是在那之后。不过它确实影响了我和克里斯后来变得熟悉。

他是魔术师,对心智很感兴趣。所以……

我不知道他是怎么找到我的,但他当时在找记忆方面的东西。很多魔术都涉及记牌顺序。所谓助记牌序很常见,就是所有魔术师都用同一个固定顺序,至于你怎么背下来,各凭本事,但没人有专门的方法,只能花时间死记。另一些牌序则有不太容易被看出的规律,方便记忆。他大概是想真正快速记住牌,所以在 Instagram 上找到我并联系了我。

这事挺好笑,因为我小时候有个朋友,其实也不算朋友。一个很亲近的女性朋友,当时交了个对她很糟糕的男朋友,名字就叫克里斯·拉姆齐。所以我以前就和一个克里斯·拉姆齐一起混过。

那是二十年前了。我一直不喜欢那个人,但她就是走不出那段关系。所以当我在 Instagram 收件箱里看到克里斯·拉姆齐时,我想:“这家伙找我干什么?”结果他的账号旁边有认证标记。我就想:“他这些年到底在干什么?”

挺厉害的。

不,是那个做解谜的克里斯。我并不认识他,但肯定看过他的视频。我说:“天哪,我的频道刚刚起步,慢慢有点起色。要是他愿意合作就太好了。”结果他确实愿意。他想跟我学,我们拍了几个视频。他把我接过去。

一切就是从那里开始的。

Yeah, I mean that's part of this whole story, too. I mean, I had

Dabbled with remote viewing already before Well, no, no, it was after, but it plays a part into Chris and I getting closer. But, I he you know, he's a magician. He's interested in the mind. so, he was

I don't know how he found me, but he was looking for something about memory. You know, a lot of magic tricks involve a memorized stack. a Mnemonica stack is a very common one where it's just like a fixed order that magicians all use. And, you know, however you get it memorized is up to you. But, nobody has a technique for it. They just take as long as they need to memorize it. There are other stacks that have like a kind of hard to notice, but an order that help you memorize it. But either way, I think he was interested in memorizing for real quickly cards. So, he found me on Instagram and reached out to me.

And it was a funny story cuz I had a friend growing up. Well, he wasn't even a friend. A close friend of mine, a female friend had a boyfriend who was terrible to her. and his name was Chris Ramsey. So, I had to hang out with a Chris Ramsey like

20 years ago. Never liked the guy, but she was, you know, she couldn't get out of the relationship. So, when I saw Chris Ramsey in my inbox on Instagram, I was like, "What the heck does this guy want?" Like, my god. but it had a check mark next to it. So, I was like, "What did this what has this guy been up to? He's like,

Yeah,

Crushing it." No, it was the puzzle guy. So, I didn't know Chris, but I had definitely seen his videos and I was like, "Oh my god, my channel was just starting,

Kind of gaining some traction." I was like, "Oh, this would be amazing if he wants to work together." And he did. He wanted to learn from me. We did a couple videos. He flew me up there

And that's that's where it all started.

Michael Phillip
[00:04:40]

太有意思了。你是在修复克里斯家族、重塑各路克里斯·拉姆齐的名声。我问这个,是因为克里斯频道早期,你们的合作正是让我注意到他作品的入口。你们做的那一系列遥视和门罗研究所内容……

真的点燃了我的好奇心。那还是很早的时候,他的频道叫 Area 52。现在它已经成了很有名的播客,但早期全都围绕大型调查展开,基本上是对不同主题的纪录片式深挖。你们合作的那一集讲遥视、门罗研究所,也算是一种关于这些超自然研究的大杂烩。

That's funny. Doing the repair work, resurrecting the good name of the Ramsies of the Chris Ramseies. But yeah, no, I ask because early on in Chris's channel, your guys' collaboration is actually what turned me on to his work in general. And that series that you guys did on remote viewing and going to Monroe Institute

Really lit a wick within, you know, my wonder because so so this was very early on in the days of Chris's channel Area 52. You know, it's become well known as this massive podcast now, but early on it was all centered around these big investigations which were essentially like these documentary deep dives on different subjects. And the one that you guys collaborated on was remote viewing Monroe Institute and sort of a I guess sort of an amalgamation of psi stuff.

纪录片片段
[00:05:34]

压倒性的证据都在说,这是真的。

我曾是美国国防部星门计划的前行动与训练官。

我叫乔·麦克莫尼格尔。我是星门计划最早招募的人。它又在我的现实里砸开了一道裂缝,让我觉得我其实什么都不知道。

我完全相信他告诉我们的东西。现在我得重新思考自己的世界观了。

我的潜意识一直在做一些我完全不知道的事。现在它快准备好了。

那真是一种对通灵者的抑制机制。

There's just an overwhelming amount of evidence that says that this is a real thing.

I am the former operations and training officer for the Department of Defense Stargate program.

My name is Joseph McMoneagle. I was the first one recruited for the Stargate program. It was another kind of like crack in my reality and it's like I really don't know anything.

I fully believe what he is telling us. I got to rethink my world view now.

My unconscious has been doing something I have no idea. But now it's about ready to go.

That is a psychic disincentive right there.

Michael Phillip
[00:06:11]

我不知道这是否是真的。如果是真的,那它说明了宇宙是什么?不过节目主要围绕出体体验和遥视。你被以一种很奇怪的灰色方式招募,开始做遥视,这个故事太疯狂了。请你讲一讲。

I don't if that's true. What does that mean about the universe? But it primarily revolved around out of body stuff and remote viewing. And your story, man, about how you got sort of like recruited in this weird sort of like gray market way to start doing remote viewing is just so wild, dude. So, please tell that story.

Nelson Dellis
[00:06:33]

好。我会讲那个故事,然后再把它和克里斯后来参与的经过串起来。我当时只是安安分分地做记忆训练。到那时我已经做了大概十年、十一年。我做的事情没有任何超自然之处,就是实用记忆训练、用脑思考和储存信息。也许有人觉得这本身就算超自然,这个可以以后再聊,但我从不这么看。每个人都有记忆,我只是用了非常有结构、有组织的方法。我拿冠军、破纪录、教学生,把它变成了职业。这些年有人找我拍纪录片、去学校、公司和团体演讲,也总会有一些奇怪的项目找上门。

比如说加入算牌团队。那挺好玩。我想找一群杂牌记忆运动员,让他们学习二十一点算牌技巧,再用记忆术获得额外优势。所以我对别人提出的、我甚至没想到过的记忆用途,一直很愿意听。我提这个,是因为接下来这件事就属于这种。当时我所在的 Facebook 群里有人发了一条不算隐晦、但非常模糊的帖子,说有个机构或公司在找一个或几个记忆运动员做兼职。就这些。我甚至不记得发帖人的名字。我只是好奇:兼职做点记忆相关的工作,能有多难?听起来挺酷。

所以我在评论里留了名字,之后收到邮件,有人问:“好,你什么时候能聊?”他们当时告诉我,那是一家投资公司,或者说交易公司。然后我和一个人通话,他一上来就问:“你听说过遥视吗?”我说:“没有。”我肯定听起来特别蠢。我真不知道。他进一步解释,或者问我:“你听说过星门计划吗?”我说:“嗯,好像听过。”我不知道在哪里听说的,可能某天晚上在 YouTube 上顺着视频看来的,但从来没真正记住,也完全没当回事。

他对此似乎没什么兴趣。

我当时想:“哇,要是真的会很酷,但我不信。”

总之,他开始解释那是什么、遥视是什么。我的第一反应就是:“好吧,这是骗局。他接下来会问我要钱,或者让我投资、参加什么项目。”

Yeah. Yeah. So, yeah, I'll share that story and then weave it into how Chris kind of played a part after that. yeah, I was just minding my own business being a memory guy. I had been doing it at that point when I got into that when was that was yeah about 10 11 years I've been doing memory training you know nothing supernatural about what I do just practical memory training and thinking in my mind and you know storing information maybe that's paranormal to some extent we can get into that later but I never thought that you know it's just like we all have memory this is just a very structured, organized approach and that's what I had been doing, winning championships, breaking records, teaching people had become my career and over the years there's been people who approached me to documentaries you know to speak to groups, schools, companies and then there's always kind of like curious projects that have come at my footstep

My doorstep and for example like joining a card counting team. That was a fun experience. I wanted to get a group, a rag tag group of memory athletes and have them

Learn blackjack count card counting techniques and use memory techniques to have an extra advantage. so I'm always open eared to things that people might approach me for for the use of memory that I might not even think of. So that's I'm I'm saying that because that's this is what that was. there was a Facebook group that I'm a part of where they posted a very not cryptic but just very vague post about, you know, side work for a memory athlete that there was a firm or some company looking for a couple memory athletes to do some part-time work.

That's literally all it said. And I don't even know if I remember the name that had posted it. I was just curious you know like a side gig part-time memory stuff. Like how hard could it be? That's kind of cool.

So, I just typed my name in as a comment and then I got my I got an email back from someone saying, "Yeah, when can you talk blah blah blah where where they think at that point they told me it was an investing firm and or trading firm and then yeah, I got on the call with a guy who right out the bat just said, you know, have you ever heard of remote viewing?" And I was like, "No, I must have sounded so dumb."

You know, I just like I'd know. I didn't know. So he then further kind of explained he's like or questioned me, "Have you heard of the Stargate program?" Then I was like, "yeah, I think I'd heard about this." I don't know where I'd heard about it. Maybe down some rabbit hole one night on YouTube or something, but it never really stuck with me. It wasn't anything that I took seriously.

He just kind of wasn't interested in as

Like, "Oh, wow. That would be cool if it was true, but I don't believe it."

But anyways, he then started to go into what it means and what it was and what remote viewing is. And I was really like, my first instinct was like, "Okay, this is a scam. He's going to start asking me for money or something. Invest in me and go through this pro whatever, you know, something."

Nelson Dellis
[00:09:54]

但他没有。他说:“我们会付钱给你。”按月支付,然后会训练我遥视。他们请了一位教练,一位遥视教练。

他们要我每天训练,做一个月。还有另一位记忆运动员也参与其中。

其实是我的好朋友。我们发现彼此都在做这件事。我之后再讲他,因为他很有意思。

总之,我们做了。抱歉打断一下,他后来公开说过自己也是其中一员吗?

没有。

But he didn't. he was like, "We will pay you." you know monthly and then they were going to train me how to remote view. They had a coach, they had hired a coach, a memor a remote viewing coach

And they were going to have me work for a month every day. and there was another memory athlete involved too.

Actually a good friend of mine. We discovered that we were both kind of working on this thing and I'll talk about him later because he's interesting.

Anyways, we worked Yeah. So, sorry to interrupt. Has he come out to be like publicly that he was part of this as well?

No.

Michael Phillip
[00:10:33]

好,所以他来自……

Okay. So, yeah, he's from

Nelson Dellis
[00:10:36]

你大概能猜到是哪个国家,但可以猜猜。他来自一个非常讲规矩、非常严格的地方,这种事在那里行不通。

而且我觉得他也很在意自己的名声,特别担心事情传出去。所以他确保我不说,我也确实一直没说。

You could probably guess what country, but you can guess. He's from a country where they are very by the book very rigid and and stuff like this does not does not work that way.

And I think his reputation also he was very concerned about it whether it got out. So he, you know, made sure that I didn't share and I haven't shared. but

Nelson Dellis
[00:11:03]

对。他的体验和我不同。他很厉害,据说结果比我还好。我们聊过很多,但他总说那只是运气、确认偏误或者样本太小。

Yeah. He didn't have the same experience I did. He was very good. Apparently his results were better than mine. But he and we talked about it a lot, but he always said, you know, it was just luck, you know, confirmation bias, you know, he or you know, small sample size. He just

Nelson Dellis
[00:11:21]

我说,好吧。总之……

I was like, okay. Anyways,

Michael Phillip
[00:11:23]

这确实很有意思。

That's really interesting. Yeah.

Nelson Dellis
[00:11:25]

最后我和这个人训练了一个月。我们训练的最终目标是做遥视,或者说关联遥视,用于预测市场。这家交易公司属于某个人,但我从没见过他,甚至没和他说过话。我一直是在和他的下属沟通。他们大概有不少“闲得发慌的钱”,想拿来试试各种东西。他们还有一支遥视团队,但我没见过,只认识另一个记忆运动员。其他人应该都不是记忆运动员。

我们加入那支团队后,会在开市前各自做一次遥视。我忘了是当天收盘前做,预测第二天,还是别的安排。我不太了解自己的结果具体怎么被使用,我只负责完成任务。他们会汇总我们的结果,以便得到更多……嗯,你知道的。

Yeah. So ultimately I worked for a month with this guy. and then the what we were training for eventually was to remote view or do associative remote viewing for daily tasks that would be for predicting the market. you know this this trading firm was owned by some guy who I never met honestly. I never even talked to him. I was talking to his underlings and they must have had a lot of FU money that they wanted to like try different things with and they had a team of remote viewers who I didn't meet. I only knew my other memory athlete guy. I guess the other people were not memory athletes

From what I understood. but we were joining that team and what they would do is they would collect we would each do a session before the market. I forget if we did it before the day ended for the next day or be must have been that I wasn't too involved in like how my results were being applied. I just did the task. but they would pool our results kind of to get more you know,

Michael Phillip
[00:12:32]

这是几年前的事,对吧?不是最近。如果有人问为什么细节这么模糊,他可是记忆冠军,应该记得清清楚楚。这里面大概有点原因。

And this was like a few years ago now, right? Like this wasn't just like if they're like why are the details foggy? He's a memory champion. He should remember exactly how this went. It's probably something. Yeah,

Nelson Dellis
[00:12:43]

我只是没有被纳入核心信息圈。我完成任务,本应分到一部分收益。但很快就能看出,这个组织并不太有条理,因为我从没见过任何结果。我一直问:“能不能看看我们开始赚钱了吗?整体表现怎么样?我个人怎么样?”我能拿到自己的结果,但拿不到团队的结果。事情很快就无疾而终了。我记得那年五月我要去珠峰,所以二月开始训练,后来每周接任务,大概一周三次,周一、周三、周五之类。

I just wasn't I was just wasn't brought in the loop. Like I did my task. I was going to be given a portion of the of the earnings. but it became very clear that this group was not very organized cuz I never saw any of the results like I kept asking like can I see have we started earning you know like how are we doing and how are we doing as a group? how am I doing? And I got information about how I was doing, but not necessarily the group.

So, and it actually fizzled out pretty quickly. I remember that year I ended up going to Everest in May. So, I started training. I trained for the month of February and then we started doing these weekly tasks. I think we did three a week. Monday, Wednesday, Friday. something like that. And then it

Michael Phillip
[00:13:36]

我们刚才没说,尼尔森也登山。我很喜欢登山。

We didn't say this already, but Nelson also climbs mountains. I love to climb mountains.

Nelson Dellis
[00:13:36]

是的。

那年我参加了一次登山探险,同时还在继续做遥视。我当时真的很投入,不想停下来,觉得自己发现了某种可能改变人生的东西,也开始有点相信了。可后来任务越来越不规律,沟通越来越差,最后彻底没消息了。后来那家公司的 CEO 出了点事。

我不太想细说,因为那是……

嗯……

对。

Yes. So I was on an expedition that year and still kept it up. I was really into it.

I should back up a bit in a moment just to talk about my experience there. But I was really into it at that point and didn't want to stop and thought I was part of something kind of life-changing for me that I discovered this thing and was starting to kind of believe in it. but then the tasks started being less regular, the communication got worse, and then it just no no silence, like nothing. and there ended up being something that happened

With the CEO of the company that I don't really want to talk about because it was

Kind of

Yeah,

Michael Phillip
[00:14:24]

法律问题,对吧?

Like legal stuff, right?

Nelson Dellis
[00:14:25]

法律问题。和遥视完全无关,也不是什么中情局之类的事,就是他卷入了某些见不得光的勾当。

Legal stuff. Nothing to do with remote viewing or anything, CA, nothing like that. It was just like u he was involved in some shady stuff.

Michael Phillip
[00:14:32]

太吓人了。

Super scary.

Nelson Dellis
[00:14:33]

我想他后来进了监狱。

And I think he went to prison. So

Nelson Dellis
[00:14:36]

我想退回去讲。

I wanted to back the way.

Michael Phillip
[00:14:39]

如果你在做特别诡异的事,想用不正当甚至不择手段的方式在市场里取得优势,那你可能也会对其他奇怪的东西持开放态度。各种事情之间差别很大,但我们先不展开。

I mean it sort of makes sense that if you're doing like really weird

Attempting Yeah. below the belt potentially unscrupulous things to try to you know get a get an advantage in the market. Maybe you're also open. I mean, there's a big chasm between various different things, but but we won't we won't get into that.

Nelson Dellis
[00:14:59]

不过报酬是有的,而且是加密货币,我现在还留着。至少在训练期间他们付了钱。我从未从基金收益里拿到钱。但我听说,我们这些遥视员参与操作的那只基金规模是 110 万美元。

所以规模不小。

这也是它诱人的原因。但谁知道呢?

也许那是后来涨到那么多,也许最初就是这个数,也许那就是最初的本金、资金池,随你怎么定义。但我的亲身经历是,我报名时首先想到的是——我妻子说:“别干,这事浪费时间,听起来像骗局。”我说:“不不不,他们会付钱给我。”她说:“是啊,当然。最后肯定会提出要求,变成你付钱给他们。”

But it wasn't a like he I got paid. I got paid in crypto, which I still have. but they paid at least during the training. I never got any money from the earnings on their fund. But I was told that the fund that

We remote viewers were working with was 1.1 million.

So it was sizable,

You know. which was why it was enticing. But who knows? Maybe

That's what it grew to or that's where it started or

That's what it started. That was the bankroll or whatever you want to call it, however you want to position it. but my experience going through it, you know, the first thing I thought when I signed up for this because my wife was like, "Don't do this. This is a waste of time. It sounds like a scam." I was like, "No, no, no. They're going to pay me." And she was like, "Yeah, sure. Sure. There's going to be an ask. It's going to be you paying them."

Nelson Dellis
[00:15:45]

而且你还在做一件根本不存在的事。她并不相信这种东西,我也不信。后来我做了几次遥视。我想,要是我能拿到钱——我觉得会——那挺酷,赚点零花钱,还能有个精彩故事:我居然被卷进这种事。无论它完全是胡扯,还是最后真有点意思。我记得最初几次练习只觉得太荒唐了,就像我在硬编瞎扯。

我一直问他:“我的信息到底从哪里来?什么都没有,怎么能有信息?”他说:“对,就是这样。”还有那些超自然的术语、各种神神叨叨的说法,我完全没准备。但我还是配合,他让我做什么就做什么。后来开始偶尔命中一点。我当然会抗拒,会想:“这到底怎么回事?是不是他在潜意识里引导我?答案是不是他偷偷给我的?”也可能只是确认偏误或运气。

但后来有些命中的东西实在太不可能被轻易解释掉。并不是我每次都对,但表现不错。我想我的命中率大概有 58%。在关联遥视里,你基本上是在两个结果、两张图之间选择,判断哪张代表结果 A、哪张代表结果 B。

And you're doing something that doesn't even exist. She doesn't really believe in that stuff. Neither neither did I. But then we you know I did a few sessions and I was just like you know what if I get paid which I think I will be cool make a few bucks and then I'll have a cool story you know like how wild that I got pulled into this and you know whether it's totally bogus or ends up being something cool. but I remember the first few sessions just being like this is so ridiculous like I'm pulling [ __ ] out of my ass. That's what it feels like, you know, that

I kept asking him like, "What am I where am I getting information like out of out of nothing, you know?" And he's like, "Yeah, that's precisely it." And you know, all this this paranormal woowoo jargon that I was just like not prepared for. but I went along, you know, and did everything that he told me. And then I started to get little hits here and I'd of course fight it and be like, "What's going on here?" you know, is he setting this up subliminally and I'm getting them right? He's leading me to these answers and, you know, or maybe it's just

Confirmation bias or just like actually just luck. but then I started to get hits that were just too impossible to explain away. not that I would get everything right, but I was pretty good. I think my success my hit rate was like 58% or something like that. and then in remote associative remote viewing, you know, you're basically choosing between two outcomes and two images that you're remote viewing and then judging yourself which image outcome A which represents outcome A or outcome B

Michael Phillip
[00:17:28]

而幕后再把结果对应到市场或某只股票上涨、下跌,对吧?就是一个二选一的局面。

Which then translated behind the scenes to the market or or the specific stock going up or down, right? A binary case.

Nelson Dellis
[00:17:36]

我 58% 的时候能选对。如果你真的只是猜,应该接近 50%。主持人问:“样本量大吗?”我们其实没做很多。我做了多少次?从开始实际执行,大概做到六月,每周三次左右,所以次数不算多。

And I would get it right 58% of the time. you know, if you're truly guessing, it should be closer to 50. was the sample size high? I mean, we didn't really get to do How many did I do? I mean, it must have been when we're actually doing stuff, you know, I worked through like June or something. So, it was three or so a week, you know, it wasn't many. So, you know,

Michael Phillip
[00:18:04]

我们先往回一点,让听众了解不同类型遥视的区别。大多数人想象的,是那种坐标遥视,或者军方下达任务,试图从遥远地点获取信息。

那是一种遥视,也是大众最熟悉的。但在星门计划时期,旁边还有另一条线索。既然如此,我们干脆再往回追一点。这个原本保密的项目始于 1970 年代,地点是斯坦福研究所,由两位物理学家哈尔·普索夫和拉塞尔·塔格负责。故事说,他们后来开始和一位通灵者英戈·斯旺合作。斯旺基本上帮他们发展出了一套灵探技术,后来他们把它称为遥视。

Let's let's back up just a little bit and bring people up to speed on the differences in these different kinds of remote viewing because I think what most people imagine is, you know, there's like the sort of coordinate remote viewing sort of military tasking or you're trying to view or get information from a distant source.

And that is one kind of remote viewing and that's what most people know of. But also alongside that in the project Stargate days, which again, why not? Let's back up further and talk about that for a minute. there's this formerly classified program started in the 70s at SRI, Stanford Research Institute, under these two physicists, Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ. Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ, the story goes, eventually start collaborating with this psychic named Ingo Swann. And this guy, Ingo Swann, essentially helps them develop this technique of psychic spying that they later call remote viewing.

纪录片片段
[00:19:07]

被称为遥视员的通灵者参与了大量行动,从寻找被伊斯兰恐怖组织绑架的人质,到追踪美国境内逃犯的行踪。在遥视世界里,有一个名字特别突出:英戈·斯旺。

英戈·斯旺声称曾用星光体旅行到遥远行星,并讲述在能量体中旅行的感觉。

这个人对遥视技术的发展与推广起到了关键作用,也让美国政府注意到它。斯旺既是著名艺术家,也是通灵者,常被认为在 1970 年代发展出第一套系统化遥视方法。他当时已因通灵能力小有名气,斯坦福研究所的科学家邀请他参与超心理现象研究。随后他开始与哈尔·普索夫博士和拉塞尔·塔格合作,两人都是超心理学领域的领军研究者。正是在斯坦福研究所,斯旺发展出他独特的遥视方法,并称之为坐标遥视。

Psychics, who were referred to as remote viewers, took part in a wide range of operations from locating hostages kidnapped by Islamic terrorist groups to tracing the paths of fugitive criminals within the United States. Now, in the world of remote viewing, one name stands out. Ingo Swann.

Ingo Swann claims to have used this astral body to travel to distant planets. He tells us how it feels to travel in this energy body.

This individual was instrumental in the development and advancement of remote viewing as a technique and helped bring it to the attention of the US government. Swann, a renowned artist and psychic, is often credited with developing the first systematic approach to remote viewing in the 70s. He had already gained some fame for his psychic abilities and was approached by scientists at SRI to participate in the research on psychic phenomena.

He soon began to work with Dr. Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ, two of the leading researchers in the field of parapsychology. It was at SRI that Swann developed his unique approach to remote viewing, which he called coordinate remote viewing,

Michael Phillip
[00:20:11]

后来他们才把它称为遥视。我最近正好查到一些有趣的历史,显示有一些团体可能更早就与美国情报系统有关,并且在更早的时候做过类似的事,非常有意思。

That they later call remote viewing. And there's actually I've I've found us some interesting history lately that shines a light on groups that were probably connected to the US intelligence apparatus doing this before this, which is very interesting.

Nelson Dellis
[00:20:27]

对,你大概已经听说过这些,因为你说自己开始读安妮·雅各布森的《现象》。那本书开头就大量讲到安德里亚·普哈里奇,或者随便怎么念这个名字。

Yeah. you probably actually have heard of this because you said you started to read Phenomena by Annie Jacobsen, but early on in that book, she talks a lot about this guy Andrija Puharich or however you say that name.

Michael Phillip
[00:20:41]

兄弟,我最近在节目上和一个叫格雷格·马洛伊的人聊过。有一集已经播了,还有一集快播了。

他当时基本上就在做遥视,但方式很奇怪:把人放进法拉第笼。

让他们进入催眠状态或非常缓慢的脑波状态,然后问他们问题,常常试图让他们获取远方的信息,或者进入别人脑中。他是一位纪录片导演,马上要推出一部关于普哈里奇的纪录片。他说自己手里有一整座资料库,全是磁带和录音棚里疯狂的东西,比如催眠通灵、遥视之类的。我问他:“你觉得你手上是不是有些可能属于机密的东西?”他说:

“百分之百。”我们都笑了,因为他无意间撞进这些信息的方式太离谱了。但这一切的点睛之笔是……

标准说法,至少《现象》里也是这么写的,是普哈里奇在斯坦福研究所那批人发明遥视之前就在做这些东西。

但他一直在这个圈子里,他们知道他,也算与他有交集。后来他又和尤里·盖勒合作。不过他们也会和盖勒保持距离,因为他的名声很有争议:既是舞台魔术师,又声称自己有真正的通灵能力。

嗯。

但后来他们还是和他拉开了距离。其实有一段影像,拍到拉塞尔·塔格和哈尔·普索夫在奥斯汀与普哈里奇、尤里·盖勒在一起。所以这些联系比他们愿意承认的更多。格雷格还发现,我想是一张斯坦福研究所给普哈里奇付款的发票或收据。所以真实联系比大家以为的更深。抱歉扯远了。总之,故事大概就是:1970 年代发展出遥视这套协议,当时极具争议,但它效果足够好,于是持续了几十年,几乎每个情报机构都利用他们和他们的团队搜集情报。

它从斯坦福研究所的小团队进入军方,后来归国防情报局管,又持续了很多年。于是才有了乔·麦克莫尼格尔、保罗·史密斯这些人。这是基本背景。过程中发展出多种遥视和多种协议。你现在讲的是关联遥视。能不能具体解释一下它是怎么运作的?

Dude, I've been talking to this guy Greg Malloi on the show. once one episode that's out, another one that's about to come out.

And dude, he he was essentially doing remote viewing in these weird like he'd put people in the Faraday cage.

Yeah. get get them in a hypnotic state or in a very slow brainwave state and query them with questions oftentimes trying to get them to access information from distant places or out of people's minds. and he is so he's a documentarian who has a documentary coming out on Puharich and he said that there's just a library of tapes and recordings of just insane stuff like hypnosis channeling sessions, remote viewing type stuff. And I asked him, I'm like, "Dude, do you think you are sitting on some potentially classified stuff?" And he's like,

"Yeah, 100%." and we both just laughed because it's it's just insane like how he stumbled into all this information. But the thing the bow on on all of this stuff is

The standard story if you it's even in phenomenon I believe is you know Puharich is doing this stuff before this SRI crew invents remote viewing

And but he's around and they're aware of him and he's sort of in the orbit. He ends up collaborating with Geller. they also sort of distance themselves from Uri Geller because you know he has this very

We'll just say controversial reputation as both a stage magician and somebody who claims to have actual psychic abilities. Y

But they distanced themselves from him. There's actually footage of Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff at in Austin with Puharich and Uri Geller. which is Yeah. So so there's more connections there than they want to admit. And Greg also uncovered I think an invoice or a receipt from SRI of them paying to Puharich. So it's actually it's more connected than people think. But but anyway, sorry for the for the for the sidebar, but but anyway, so that's sort of the story is in the 70s you have this protocol called remote viewing that gets developed and it's extremely controversial at the time, but it does well enough that it persists for like decades. And basically every intelligence agency uses them and their team to try to get intelligence.

Seemingly it goes from this small group at SRI into the army's hands under the DIA later and keeps going for for years and years after that. That's where you get these people like Joe McMoneagle, Paul Smith, etc., etc. So, so that's sort of the setup and along the way there are multiple kinds of remote viewing and multiple kinds of protocols developed. So, the one you're talking about is associative remote viewing. C can you explain a little bit how that how that works exactly?

Nelson Dellis
[00:23:46]

可以。我应该提一下,我认为英戈·斯旺真正让它流行起来的地方,是给某种超感官知觉起了名字,并给了它一套正确的程序。

像是一串可以交给别人、教别人照做的步骤。随着它渗透到不同部门和项目,也出现了不同风格。即使今天,你找不同的人学遥视,方法大概也不一样,但核心思想相同:你显然是在从直觉里提取念头,再把它画成图像,尽量不命名,只做描述性表达。人们做法各有不同。教我的那个人,我想他是出自埃德·梅那个分支。

是埃德·梅还是埃德·戴姆斯?对,不是埃德……对,埃德·梅。是另一个人。

Yeah. and I should even mention that like, you know, I think I think what Ingo Swann did that popularized remote viewing. I mean, it just gave some kind of extra sensory perception a name and a

Right protocol like a list of steps to do it to hand over to someone and teach them. and I think from that as it kind of permeated through different departments and programs, you know, there's different styles of it. and even today if you find someone teaching remote viewing there's probably different approaches but generally it's the same idea you know that you're obviously coming up with intuition thoughts from your intuition and painting a picture you know through without kind of naming things descriptive things. So you know people do it in different ways. The guy that taught me, I think he came from Ed May or Ed Dames.

Ed May or Ed Dames. Yeah. Not Ed. Not Ed. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Ed May. Someone else.

Michael Phillip
[00:24:53]

对。

Yeah. And so he came from a different kind of branch of that.

Nelson Dellis
[00:24:58]

他来自那条不同的分支。

有些人瞧不上这种路数,另一些人觉得都一样。说来好笑,其实基本都是一回事。

Some poo poo that way, others, you know, find it the same. What

It's funny, but it's all it's all kind of the same. But anyways,

Michael Phillip
[00:25:06]

对。抱歉又打断,但之后我们应该专门聊聊埃德·戴姆斯,因为他最近去世了。

Yeah, and we should sorry sorry to interrupt again, but we should after this we should sidebar into Ed Dames because he passed away recently.

Nelson Dellis
[00:25:13]

是的。

He did.

Michael Phillip
[00:25:14]

对,他确实去世了。就像你说的,他是遥视员这一流派里非常具争议的人物。你和克里斯其实见过他,对吧?

还是只有克里斯?

And yeah, he did. and to your point, yeah, he's a very controversial part of this school of remote viewers. And you and Chris actually met him, right?

Or was it just Chris?

Nelson Dellis
[00:25:25]

不,我们是一起去的。他是第一个联系我们、同意见我们的人。我们和他待了一天半。他很好,是个很友善的人,也有一些疯狂的想法。

不过我们谁没有呢。

No, no, we went together. He was he was the first

Person we got a hold of that agreed to spend time with us. And yeah, we spent a whole day and a half with him. great nice guy. Had some crazy wild ideas.

But we all do.

Michael Phillip
[00:25:44]

他被认为是痴迷于异常现象或秘传目标的人。

Well, well, he's known as the guy who had an obsession with anomalous or esoteric targets.

Nelson Dellis
[00:25:51]

没错。

That's true. Yeah.

Michael Phillip
[00:25:52]

当他在布拉格堡和其他遥视员在一起时,常常在大家闲着的时候派任务,比如遥视某个 UFO 事件。

或者遥视……

约柜,遥视遥远行星之类的。

特别有意思。

Yeah. So when he was at Fort Meade with all these other remote viewers, he would often be like he he would try to have them he would task them when they weren't doing anything like try to remote this

UFO thing that happened, try to remote view

You know the Ark of the Covenant, try to remote view all these distant planets and stuff like that, which

Is super interesting.

Nelson Dellis
[00:26:18]

是啊,为什么不呢?

Yeah. Like why not, you know?

Michael Phillip
[00:26:19]

没错。但那些更看重结果、也更清楚偏见和欲望会污染结果的人,就会顾虑这种做法。而且你永远拿不到反馈,不知道它到底是不是真的。

Yeah. Yeah. Totally. But yeah, but then these guys who were more results-oriented and sensitive to the idea that your bias, your desire is going to start to contaminate the results obviously. And plus, you're never going to get the feedback on whether this can be real or not. Yeah.

Nelson Dellis
[00:26:43]

对,你不知道。真正的遥视会给你反馈,告诉你有没有命中,对吧?

Yeah. You see, you don't know. You know, like true remote viewing, you get feedback like are you correct or not?

02

星门计划与关联遥视Stargate and Associative Remote Viewing

00:26:51 – 00:44:53

广告|Patreon / YouTube 会员 · [00:26:51] 起(展开)
广告口播|Michael Phillip广告
[00:26:51]

朋友们,我最近在 YouTube 会员区和 patreon.com/thirdeyedrops 准备了一些好东西。什么好东西?还有,“烹饪”真的是你现在能想到的最佳动词吗?先回答前一个问题:这些好东西是每周、至少大致每周发布的会员专属内容,主频道永远看不到,嘉宾包括你最喜欢的那些人。举个例子,我正在慢慢制作一部今年在 Contact in the Desert 拍摄的纪录片,里面有很多你熟悉的人谈 UFO 和意识。我会把所有人的完整未剪辑对话只发在会员频道和 Patreon 上。

如果你加入 patreon.com/thirdeyedrops,就能看到所有专属视频,还能加入 Patreon Discord,偶尔参加直播等等。当然,如果我没说清楚,纪录片最后也会在主频道发布。非常感谢大家观看。

朋友们,顺便帮我哄一哄算法,点赞、订阅;如果你是在 Spotify 收听,也请留个评价。

Friends, I have been cooking up the goods over in the members section on YouTube and at patreon.com/thirdeyedrops. What are said goods? And was cooking really the best verb you could summon on this occasion? well, to the former question, said goods are weekly, at least roughly, exclusive content that you are never going to see here on the main feed, with some of your favorite guests. By the way, case in point, I am slowly working on a doc that I shot at Contact in the Desert this year with a number of your favorite beings on the topic of UFOs and consciousness.

And I will be releasing the full unedited conversations with all of those people only on the members channel and on Patreon. If you do join up over at patreon.com/thirdeyedrops, you will get access to all of those exclusive videos plus a Patreon Discord and occasional live hangs and more. And yes, of course, the doc will be coming out on the main feed if I didn't make that clear. So much love for watching,

My friends, while I have you, please tickle that algorithm: like, subscribe, and leave a review if you are listening on Spotify.

Michael Phillip
[00:27:54]

这显然会污染结果。而且你永远拿不到反馈,不知道自己到底有没有做对。

It contaminates the results, obviously, and you're never going to get feedback on whether this can be real or not.

Nelson Dellis
[00:28:09]

对,你不知道。真正的遥视……

你会得到反馈,知道自己是否正确。按埃德·梅的说法,他甚至认为你所做的只是看见未来的结果。所以如果拿不到反馈,你就无法做好遥视,甚至根本做不了。

关联遥视就是拿这套遥视协议,去处理未来可能发生的事。也有办法处理不只两个简单结果的情况,但二选一最容易。我之后会举例说明多结果的情况。比如体育博彩就很好用:球队赢不赢,球员有没有达到预期得分,或者股票涨跌。它的运作方式是,先有一个下任务的人,和普通遥视一样,他会选择一个任务编号。理想情况下,下任务的人自己也不知道真实结果或目标。

Yeah. You see, you don't know. You know, true remote viewing,

You get feedback like are you correct or not? And I mean, even according to Ed May, he thinks that all you're doing is just seeing that result in the future. so if you don't get the feedback, you're not going to be able to remote view well or at all.

But yeah, so the associative remote viewing is a way to take this remote viewing protocol but apply it to things that could happen in the future. and there's ways to do it for situations that don't have just two simple outcomes, but that's the easiest. I'll give you some examples later about doing it for things that are more than binary, but you know, so things like sports betting is a great example.

Whether a team wins or not, whether you know a player hits their the their expected points or not, you know, or if the stock goes up or down. and the way it works is that there's a tasker like there would be in any remote viewing task where they you know choose a task number and it and some well see this is what so sometimes these are set up differently where it's ideally even the tasker would be by not

Michael Phillip
[00:29:37]

对,他应该是盲的。

Right they wouldn't know

Nelson Dellis
[00:29:38]

对,他不知道实际结果或目标,但负责分配任务。

关联遥视中会有一个任务编号,遥视员照常尝试遥视。但幕后有两个结果:结果 A 和结果 B。我从没做过下任务的人,所以只自己练过关联遥视。我会在脑中、口头或纸上写下结果 A 是什么,比如 A 队赢;结果 B 是什么,比如他们输了,或另一队赢。然后每个情况会随机配一张图像,遥视员看不到。做完后再揭晓照片。理想情况下,由独立方依据多种因素和评分系统,判断你的内容更符合照片 A 还是照片 B。得分更高的一边就是预测结果。

Would they be blind right to what the actual result or the target is but they would assign it. but in associative remote viewing, you have a task number where the remote viewer will do the task will try to remote view like they usually would. But behind the scenes, there's two outcomes, outcome A and outcome B. And I think I was never a tasker, so I I've only done this kind of

By myself to play around with associative remote viewing, but I kind of just have ment I say mentally out loud, or out loud on paper, what outcome A is, you know, team A, team whatever wins, and what outcome B is, they lose, right? Or the other team wins. And then there's some randomizing of some image for each situation that the remote viewer doesn't doesn't see. And they do their session and then afterwards they're revealed each photo and ideally an independent party will judge based on a myriad of factors some kind of scoring system how accurate your session was to either photo A or photo B. And whichever one scores better, that's your your prediction, you know.

Michael Phillip
[00:31:01]

好,我替自己和听众总结一下。你会拿到一个没有意义的任务编号,比如一个六位数。

Yeah. Yeah. So, so to just sort of try to summarize what you said for myself and for for everyone else. So, you would get a tasking which is a meaningless thing that represents

Nelson Dellis
[00:31:16]

对,六到八位数。

Yeah. something get a number six

Michael Phillip
[00:31:18]

对。

而关联遥视把它变成二元选择的方式,是预先定下两个彼此不同的图像、物体或类似的东西。假设我选一个球和一支铅笔,两者形状差别很大。尼尔森或任何遥视员都不知道,铅笔代表市场上涨,球代表市场下跌。于是遥视员做练习,同样不知道自己要看的究竟是铅笔还是球。但他的印象更接近哪一个,最后就按哪一个判断;或者说,幕后的人就拿它来对应市场。如果他画出的东西又长又细,更接近铅笔,就代表市场上涨;更接近球,就代表市场下跌,或者球队输,等等。

大致对吗?

Right

To eight digit number

And then with associative remote viewing the way you turn this into a binary is there are two predetermined images or objects or something that are different from one another. So let's just say I choose a ball and I choose a pencil like two very different shaped things. Unbeknownst to Nelson or whoever the remote viewer is, the pencil represents the market will go up. The ball represents the market will go down.

So he does his remote viewing session. And again, he doesn't know he's supposed to be either viewing a pencil or a ball. But whatever his impressions are sort of closer to, right, is what is what you end up choosing or whatever the person behind the scenes ends up taking your choice to make. So if he draws something long and skinny that's the that's closer to a pencil so that means market will go up. If he draws something closer to a ball that means the market goes down or the sports team loses or whatever.

Is that essentially right?

Nelson Dellis
[00:32:24]

对。

完全正确。

有时结果不会偏向任何一边,就只能算弃权,因为确实没有令人信服的内容。我们设定了评分阈值,看有多少比例偏向一边。如果图片 A 得分超过 70%,就比较确信;如果只是 50 比 50,或者 51 比 49,那就说算了。这就是为什么我们要多个遥视员。

这种情况不可避免,我们希望每个人都能继续参与每一笔交易。

所以某个人弃权,并不意味着整个团队都要终止当场练习。

Yeah.

Exactly.

Yeah. And you know sometimes the the results wouldn't favor either or and sometimes you just count it as a pass you know because there's nothing really convincing. you know, we had a threshold of what percentage, you know, from the scoring would favor one or the other. You know, if it was like over 70% scoring wise for photo A, then that's pretty confident that it's a in this case, but if it was like 50/50,

We would just say or even like 51, you know, 49 say like no, never mind. That's why we have numerous viewers because

That inevitably happens and you know we want to keep rolling the ball for each

Trade. So, you know, just because someone has a pass, hopefully the whole session isn't for the group isn't terminated, you know.

Michael Phillip
[00:33:18]

对。你提到自己一开始很怀疑,也觉得自己准确率大概 58%,但你又有一位同样尊重的记忆运动员朋友,他并不认为这是真的。

Yeah. Yeah. So, at what point, you know, you mentioned your skepticism going into it. You mentioned you believe that you were 58ish% accurate, but you have this friend who who you also respect who's also a memory athlete who is not convinced.

Michael Phillip
[00:33:36]

那你从什么时候开始觉得,或许这里面真有点东西?或许这些感知能力、ESP 能力是真的?

That this was anything real. So at what point do you start coming around to the idea that there might be something to this? That these psi capacities, these ESP capacities, are probably real?

Nelson Dellis
[00:33:36]

不过我要说清楚,我还是没有百分之百相信。

对,我倾向于相信那里确实有点什么,但它会波动。时而高,时而低,显然和结果有关。漏掉很多时,我会想自己在干什么,感觉什么都没有;可一旦命中,感觉几乎像一次下载。我不会说自己盲目认定它就是真的,只是有较高信心觉得有事发生。但信心会根据结果和生活状态而变化。

Yeah. I should be very clear that I'm still not 100% convinced.

Yeah,

I'm more convinced than not that there's something there, but I it fluctuates, man. I go through ups and downs, you know, and it's obviously tied to my results, you know, like when I miss a lot, it's kind of like what am I doing, you know? Like this doesn't feel like anything, but then I get a hit and it feels like almost like a download. like like I wouldn't say it's 100% like I'm not blindly like this is a thing.

I'm I have a high confidence that there's something going on but it fluctuates and it varies depending on how my results are how my life is going.

Nelson Dellis
[00:34:32]

我成长过程中从没给这类东西留下空间。我一直很务实、唯物。直到我同意参加这个项目,开始得到这些无法解释的结果,才开始质疑。如果遥视是真的,那我建立的世界观又意味着什么?那段时间让我困惑、也很有挑战。但归根结底,我一直想知道生命的意义、我们为什么在这里、意识是什么。过去确信的东西受到质疑,我觉得很好,也很欢迎这种思考方式。

不过有几场练习真的让我起鸡皮疙瘩,那些关键时刻让我从“这是江湖骗术”转向“等等,这里面确实有东西”。

这到底怎么回事?太疯狂了。我好像在克里斯和我第一次深挖遥视时分享过这件事,那是一张鲸鱼跃出水面的照片。

You know because I never allowed room for this kind of stuff growing up. I've always been very matter-of-fact and materialist. you know it only started to come into question when I agreed to do this program and started to have these results and couldn't explain these results and if I allow for remote viewing to be real what does that say about everything that I've built my whole worldview in my life so it was a very confusing challenging part of my life to deal with that but interesting you know like I I think at the root of everything I've always wanted to find the answer to the meaning of life and why we're here and consciousness and having what I thought was the way things were questioned. I think it's great. It's very welcome to me to think like that.

So but there were some sessions I had mentioned before that really like gave me goosebumps and those were some of the pivotal moments that made me shift from kind of like ah this is some quackery you know to wait there's something here to

What is going on here like this is wild you know I think I shared this on Chris's and I first deep dive on on remote viewing where it It was a picture of a whale breaching.

Nelson Dellis
[00:35:57]

那只是我们一次普通训练。他给了我一个任务编号。

我开始按照他教的多步骤流程做。当时已经训练几周,所以进入得很深,不是表层描述和简单草图,而是很多层。我们先从一个层面开始,再对着看到的多个部分反复做多次练习,越来越深,写出一页又一页笔记。这一次,

And you know it was just a regular one of our training sessions. He gave me a task number.

I started doing the multiple steps that he had taught me. and by that point I was a few weeks in. So we were pretty deep. It wasn't just very surface level descriptions and a light sketch. It was many levels where we start with that. we do multiple sessions for multiple parts of what we're seeing. and it gets very deep. pages and pages of of notes. And this one,

Michael Phillip
[00:36:28]

你算是进入状态了。

You're kind of in the zone.

Nelson Dellis
[00:36:30]

对。你会越来越深,这很酷,因为一开始只能碰到目标的零星碎片,还有很多噪声。然后你挑出单个命中点,继续深入,再递归重复这个过程。这次我做成了三部分。一部分比较横向、潮湿,像某种景观;另一部分是生命体;第三部分又是湿润感,但不是固定的东西,而是一种运动。顺着每一部分往下挖、再拆分,我最后描述那个动物时说出了“鲸脂”“跃出水面”之类的词,没有直接说鲸鱼。我还描述它很大,有像附肢一样伸出来的东西,但我想我没说“鳍”。

画出来时,我把它画成这种弧线,像是身体这样弯出去。那时我并不知道它是鲸鱼。我已经训练自己不急着命名,只描述,做完后再回头看整个记录,才决定“哦,确实像鲸鱼”。所谓表面那一部分,最后拼起来像波浪起伏的海洋表面。那个潮湿、运动的部分,像滴落的水雾。全部合在一起,就是一头鲸鱼从海面跃出,海面翻涌,天气阴沉潮湿,色调发灰。

跃出的鲸鱼旁边有水雾滴落,照片里也能看到。等我画完草图再看照片时——我觉得自己分享过,网站也有——对我来说……每次做完练习,我都要求自己按十分制打分,看看感觉有多准。我对自己特别苛刻,大多数时候只给一分,甚至半分。真正好的时候会给三四分。但这是第一次我给了七分,甚至像是七点五分。

那基本就是十分。当然,里面有没有噪声和错误?有。但命中的东西太多。在所有可能的目标和那些细节之间,我不认为还能是别的东西,只能是我确实连接到了……

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You get kind of get deeper and deeper. which is cool because at first you kind of like hit little notes of a target, but there's a lot of noise. but then you pick apart these individual hits, and go deeper and kind of recursively do that process. And in this one session, I had kind of three parts to it. One was something that was more like horizontal, wet, kind of like a landscape kind of thing.

Then another part was this life form. and then a third part was again more kind of wetness, but it was kind of like this movement rather than just like a fixed thing. so going down the rabbit hole on each one, further kind of dissecting each, I ended up describing for the animal some kind of I didn't say whale, but it was some kind of I had the words blubber breaching you know large like had I don't think I used the word fins, but had these kind of appendages popping out.

And then when I sketched it, I had it kind of like arcing this way with it's and I didn't know it was a whale when I said this. I'm just at this point I've trained myself to really not name anything and just describe and then afterwards I can look at what everything in my session and then decide, oh yeah, it's kind of like a whale. and then the surface thing ended up being, when I put it all together, kind of like a wavy ocean, you know, like an ocean surface.

And then the movement thing, watery, was like dripping mist water, you know. and then when I put it all together, it was this whale breaching out of the ocean with like a turbulent surface, ocean surface, kind of like a gloomy, damp weather, gray.

And off of the breaching whale was this kind of mist dripping that you could see in the photo. And when I saw that photo after I drew my sketch, it was I think I shared it. it's on my website as well. but to me, you know, and I after every session, I had always I was always told to score it out of 10, like how I feel about it. And I was so hard on myself, I'd give myself a one, maybe half a point out of 10 most times.

Sometimes when it was like actually a good session, I'd probably say three or four, but this one was the first where I was just like, you know, I said seven. I think I even said seven and a half, which,

You know, it's basically a 10, you know. Yeah. could there have been more? And was there was there noise that wasn't correct? Sure. But there was so much correct with it. And of all the things it could have been and those details that I got, there was no way it was anything else but me actually connecting to

Nelson Dellis
[00:39:33]

某种东西。我也不知道那是什么。

This whatever it was, you know.

Michael Phillip
[00:39:35]

兄弟。

所以那时候你完全没看过照片,对吧?

对吧?

这是你的画。这里像水,你从没直接说水,但看起来像水和波浪。有东西从里面出来,还有东西从它身上垂下来,旁边有滴落。

自然环境中,天气很舒服。这里我错了。

画面上有两个明显的元素。一个是某种生命体跃出,带着进出动作。另一个更湿、更黏,从上往下掉落。

那是一头鲸鱼跃出水面。

Yeah, dude.

So, at this point, you haven't seen the photo at all,

Right?

This is your drawing. We have the what looks like water. You never called it water, but what looks like water and waves. something coming out. we got things coming off it and then we have this dripping

Nature setting in pleasant weather. I was off there

With two distinct things in the image. One is a life form of sorts, breaching, with movement in and out. A second thing is more wet and sticky, falling from up to down.

It was a whale breaching.

Nelson Dellis
[00:40:12]

对,对。

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Michael Phillip
[00:40:13]

你还有自己的草图。

You and you have your sketch.

Nelson Dellis
[00:40:15]

对我来说,这已经足够让我停下来承认:这里有事情发生。

Yeah. And to me that was worthy of something being it was worthy of me stopping to say something is happening here.

Michael Phillip
[00:40:21]

这几乎是一个本体论级别的时刻。

考虑某种可能性是一回事,亲身经历非常奇怪、并让你重新定位自己的事又是另一回事。我们后面还会聊其他异常经历,我不知道你是否都亲历过,但我相信你经历过某种形式。事情发生时,你会震惊到只想说:天哪。

虽然在此之前,至少没有明确证据表明我经历过这种事,但我觉得每个人都有奇怪的预感,或者边界模糊的预知梦之类的东西。

可当它真的发生,当你刻意去做一件事,然后砰,它以一种违背所有概率的方式发生。你当然可以用大数定律之类去解释概率,可真发生在自己身上时,那种解释远远不够。你内心深处知道,这大概率不是那个原因,而是某种真正奇怪、正如我说的,在存在论上让你重组世界的东西。

我也很好奇,给不了解的人讲讲这个流程。

你并不是坐在那里闭眼入定、一动不动。你面前有一张纸,在写下印象、画形状,给出整体格式塔式感受,然后再深入某个感觉正确的东西,类似这样,对吧?

I mean that's a borderline ontological moment right because you

It's one thing to consider a possibility it's another thing to experience something very strange and reorienting for yourself. I mean, we we'll get into this like later on in the conversation with other anomalous things that we've or I'm not I'm not sure if you've exactly experienced, but I believe you've experience some form of and when it happens, it's just so insane that you have this moment of like, holy [ __ ]

Even though I have never experienced that in my life up until now, at least unequivocally, I think we all have like weird premonitions or like kind of borderline precognitive dreams or whatever,

But when it really happens like I am purposefully trying to do something like this and boom, it it happens in a way that just defies all the odds. And yes, you can make some sort of like law of large numbers kind of argument and odds, but but when it actually happens to you, that is deeply unsatisfactory. like like I think it's like you know somewhere deep down when it's when it's probably not that and when it's something that's truly strange and like I said ontologically reorienting.

So I'm also curious you know like what for also for people that don't know the procedural

Elements of this you're you're not sitting there in like a meditative state you know with your eyes closed and not moving. You have a piece of paper in front of you. you're you're sort of like scribbling down impressions, right? And drawing shapes and giving overall summary gestalt sorts of ideas and then you're kind of drilling down into something that that feels correct or something to that effect, right?

Nelson Dellis
[00:42:16]

对,对。

Yeah, yeah.

Michael Phillip
[00:42:16]

比如做这个特定目标时,有没有一个时刻,你突然确定是水生生物之类的?还是那些印象逐渐围成一圈,让答案变得明显?

Like when you were doing this particular target,

Was there a point where you really settled in on, like,

Nelson Dellis
[00:42:27]

当时我越来越擅长不因为“这是水生、海洋生物”而过度兴奋,只继续描述,并尽量不让自己在脑中把它画成完整图像。因为我发现那样结果更好,不受逻辑和大脑逻辑侧引导。但这很难。后来更有经验时,也不是每次都能做得完美,有些天更能专注,原因不明。

我没有在冥想,也不是莲花坐、背景放音乐。我只是拿着笔和纸,分析自己的念头。随着几周过去,我觉得它和记忆训练有相似之处,这也增强了我和这个过程的连接。

我坐下来记忆、回忆信息时,也是拿着笔和纸,凭记忆写出来。那种伸手去够信息的感觉很像。区别当然在于,记忆里的信息是我自己用记忆术放进去的;但把它取出来时,仍像是从存放位置下载。如今在遥视练习中,我也像在下载信息,只是不知道来源。你也许会说记忆信息就在脑中,可我也不知道具体在哪,它存在于念头里,而念头究竟来自哪里,谁也不知道。过程中有很多相似的感觉,很像记忆、回忆,以及从大脑中调取记忆。

You know, aquatic life form sort of thing or or was it sort of just like the impressions were were drawing a circle around this thing that started to make it obvious? Yeah, at that point I was getting better at not getting too excited that I was like, "This is the aquatic marine life, whatever." and really just describing, you know, and trying really to remove myself from painting the picture in my mind. because I found that my results would be better when I would do that, not guided by, you know, my logic, the logical side of the brain. which is hard and I could even later on when I was more experienced it's not like I could do it perfectly some days better than others and who knows exactly why I could focus better on that than others but I wasn't meditating you know it wasn't like I'm in some lotus pose or anything with some

Music in the background no it's just you know me with a pen and paper analyzing my thoughts and as the weeks progress. This is why I think it also elevated the connection to this process and this this ability for me was how similar it felt to when I sat down to memorize something

And recall information. I sit down with a pen and paper, I write it out from memory and it's almost a similar feeling where I'm reaching for information. You know, granted the difference is I've placed the information there myself by thinking about it in a in a memory technique way, but the feeling of kind of like downloading it from where I placed it really felt similar to how I would download information from wherever this was coming.

The only difference again is that I don't know where I'm downloading it from in a remote game session in a in a I mean you could argue that for the memory like yeah it's in my brain but I don't know where it is. It's it's in a thought that who knows where it's actually coming from but there were a lot of similarities in the feelings that I got in the process that felt a lot like memorizing and recalling and accessing memories from the brain.

03

记忆、视觉化与非局域信息Memory, Visualization, and Nonlocal Information

00:44:53 – 01:01:18

Michael Phillip
[00:44:53]

对。这让我想到,你知道安吉拉·福特(Angela Ford)吗?疑 还是安吉拉什么,我觉得她还有另一个名字,但我一下想不起来。她也是星门计划遥视员。她做练习时,对外表现得比我更“新纪元”,更相信有其他智能、还有灵体、指导灵之类的,她相信是这些力量在把信息传给她。

而且她是团队里最好的遥视员之一。因为她成功率高,任务似乎源源不断。但早期他们很想把她塞进坐标遥视的框框里,说:“不行,你不能那样做,要按我们的方法来。我们不想搞神秘魔法那一套。”

那样在我们看来不好,尤其要把结果交给并不直接参与的上层时。

但我不禁想,第一,我已经能接受我们的心智也许可以连接无形智能。无论它们是否存在,仅仅拥有这种机制,可能就会改善结果,因为你有了一个理论上的渠道,知道信息如何获得。

Yeah. Yeah. You know, that reminds me that there are, you know, have you do you know of Angela Ford or Angela I think she goes by a different name too, but that's escaping me right now. But but anyway, yeah, like she she's an example of someone who when she does her sessions, she's another she's another Stargate remote viewer, by the way, but she for people that don't know, she was

Much more outwardly New Age-y and open to the idea that I am using other intelligences, spirits,

Guides, whatever

That will give me this information.

And she was one of the best remote viewers of the group. And apparently she kept getting all these tasks over and over again because of her success. But early on they were very much trying to confine her into the, you know, the coordinate remote viewing box and being like, no, you don't do it this way. You have to do it our way. We don't want to be doing like woo magic [ __ ] We want to be doing like, you know, the

This method like that's a bad look for us. We don't want to, you know, especially when we have to show our results to higher ups that are not directly involved.

But, but I have to wonder,

One, I'm already open to the idea that there are disembodied intelligences that our minds can connect to. too. I wonder if whether there are or whether there aren't just having that mechanism can somehow improve your outcomes because now you have this theoretical

Nelson Dellis
[00:46:22]

嗯。

This this theoretical mechanism for how that information is obtained. Mhm.

Michael Phillip
[00:46:28]

也许它就像群体思想体,如果你熟悉这个概念。

你几乎在创造一个外部思想形态,像一台虚拟机,可以从别处取得信息,再把信息给你。我不知道。

So maybe it's almost like an egregore or something if you if you're familiar with that idea. Like you're you're almost creating

This external thought form like a virtual machine or something that can access information from somewhere else that can then give you the information. I don't know.

Nelson Dellis
[00:46:43]

我也不知道。但我觉得我们之前没聊过,为什么他们最初会找我们这些记忆运动员。当时有个理论:因为我们的视觉化能力经过高度训练,而记忆术本质上就是视觉化,所以我们做这个会更擅长。我们得到的下载或直觉信息会更强烈、更清晰,因为我们更能在脑中“看见”东西。我和另一个记忆运动员聊过,的确,我们看到的画面非常强烈、清楚。

这就是我们在记忆领域里的技能。

所以对我来说很合理。我倒是想听听其他学过遥视的人怎么描述他们看到的东西。

Yeah. I don't know either. But I mean the reason I don't think we talked about this why people were reaching out to us in the first place, memory athletes specifically, was there was this theory that because we had such highly trained visual capacities, which is all memory technique is, that we would be better at this. And so the downloads or the int intuitive stuff that we pull would be heightened and clearer because we can see things in our mind better.

I don't know. I've talked about it with the other memory athlete and it was like, yeah, I mean, we're seeing stuff and it's very overwhelming and clear for us, but

That's how we do our our thing, our our our skill

In the memory world. So, it seemed obvious to me. I'd be interested to hear from other remote viewers who learned it, you know, what they're how they describe what they're seeing, you know.

Michael Phillip
[00:47:42]

我有个相关问题:你一直都能清晰地在脑中想象画面吗?还是通过记忆训练练出来的?我平时这方面能力很差。

Yeah. On a related question, have have you always had the capacity to visualize things sharply or is that something that you had to hone through the memory work because I'm someone who I have I do not have a good ability to do that normally.

Nelson Dellis
[00:47:56]

我觉得我一直挺擅长视觉化。比如你说大象,我能在脑中相当清楚地想象一头大象。开始接触记忆术前,我没想过这件事。但作为记忆教练,我见过各种人,有些人就是比别人更会“看见”。有意思的是,记忆术和运动里的心流状态很像。在心流中,你不知道自己在做什么,动作自然流出来,很轻松。竞技记忆也有心流。我每天都记牌,也应用一套流程,做过无数次,但还是必须执行流程,不是盯着牌就会自动吸收。可有些天,我做着做着,几乎觉得自己不参与其中。

我只是机械地做,像一个旁观者看着我的大脑完成这件事。那种感觉很怪,因为恰恰是在我最不参与的时候,成绩最好。我有些最佳成绩就是那样取得的。我记得有一次记完一副牌,我觉得自己甚至没真正应用流程,也不记得有没有主动想过图像,几乎完全自动,只是凭感觉。所以讨论视觉化时,人们首先会问:“我能在脑中看见那个东西吗?”你说一个东西,我能不能看见?可“看见”并不能完整描述它。

Yeah. I've I think I've always been pretty good at being able to visualize something, you know, say elephant, I can picture an elephant and imagine it, you know, in pretty good detail. I'd never really thought about that since until I started dabbling in memory techniques. But as a memory coach, I had there's a spectrum of people who can see better than others. But the interesting thing about memory techniques, when you're in the flow zone or flow state of any sport, right, you don't know what's going on.

You're just doing the thing and it flows out of you. It's easy. There is a flow state for competitive memory. You know, like I memorize decks of cards every single day and I apply a process. I know what I'm doing. I've done it a million times, but I still have to apply a process. It's not like I just stare at the cards and they just get absorbed. I have to do a thing. but there are days where I do the thing and I almost feel like I'm not

A part of it. I'm just going through the motions and I'm I'm I'm watching on stand like I'm a what do you call it bystander to the process of my brain doing this thing and it's a weird feeling because in those moments when I'm almost the most not a part of it

Is when I do really well. like I've had some of my best scores when I have felt that and it's like I remember finishing memorizing a deck of cards like that and being like I felt like I don't really I don't I don't think I applied the process. I don't think I even what did I don't think I pictured anything or or took the time to picture anything. It was just almost like complete automatic process with feeling just feeling stuff.

So you know when you talk about what is visualization and can people do it? I think the first thing people think is like, can I see the thing in my mind? I say a thing or I'm trying to describe something, can I see it? But in the mind, like seeing doesn't really encapture capture the whole thing. It's

Nelson Dellis
[00:50:01]

它由连接、感觉、所有感官信息一起构成,不只是视觉。我说自己看见大象,不只是轮廓和颜色,还能想象自己在野生动物园里,空气中有尘土和暖意,有气味、味道,以及我的感受。但在快速记牌时,根本没时间为每张牌坐下来想象所有细节。

我们只是凭感觉。教记忆术时,这最疯狂。我一开始会说:“闭上眼,想象这个,调动所有感官。”但当你越来越快,很多东西都会消失,最后剩下什么?我也不知道。

Built out of so many things, connections, feelings, all sensory information, not just seeing. So when I say I see an elephant, yeah, I can see the contour, the colors, but I can also imagine myself on a safari and the dust kicking in the air, the warmth in the air, the smells, the tastes, how I feel, you know? And so I think when we're going really quickly through a deck of cards, there's no time to sit there and picture every single detail and visualize it in that sense of the word.

We're kind of just feeling it. and that's the crazy thing when I teach memory techniques. start with saying, "Hey, close your eyes and picture this, all the senses, blah blah blah." But when you want to get fast, over time, a lot of that [ __ ] just drops away and it's like, what are you left with? I don't know.

Michael Phillip
[00:50:48]

对,兄弟。

Yeah, dude.

Nelson Dellis
[00:50:48]

所以有人问:“我不会视觉化,还能记忆吗?”我觉得最终也许不重要。当你几乎自动、下意识完成时,你并没有真的在看什么,更多是一种知道。

这么聊会变得很抽象。但这个话题以后还得回来。因为我觉得你正在说:到了某个点,蛇几乎咬住了自己的尾巴。一边是我们自以为理解、有方法的普通记忆,另一边是模糊、不知道如何运作的超感官能力。听起来,存在一种心境,你几乎伸进了肉身之外的某个空间,进入某种柏拉图式的心智领域。

So when someone says, "I can't visualize, so can I memorize?" Well, I don't know. I say I don't think it matters. I think ultimately when you're able to do it almost automatically subconsciously, you're not really seeing anything, you know? It's super it's really just a knowing.

I don't know. It's it's it gets really heady when you talk about it like that. But yeah, we we should come back to this topic later because I think where you're starting to go here is you're saying that there's a there's a point where the snake almost eats its own tail between what what's considered to be mundane prosaic memory stuff that we quote unquote understand because we we do it and there's a method for it and then this psi stuff that's more murky and we don't really know how it works.

It sounds like you're saying that there is this state of mind that can be achieved where it's almost like you are reaching some space outside of the meat suit that exists in this sort of platonic mind realm

Michael Phillip
[00:51:58]

当你进入那个状态,你就像获得了超越正常的强化能力,能接触某类信息。

Or something. and when you access that state, you almost have this enha you have this like enhanced capacity beyond the normal or something like that information.

Nelson Dellis
[00:52:12]

对。

就是这样。这也是为什么我越来越接近遥视和超自然世界。因为即使记忆术,也让我觉得信息存在于我们之外。大脑像磁带的读写头,你把卡带放进播放器,它读取经过的信息,也能写入。信息不在播放器里,大脑像播放器。

外面有不同磁带可以装入、写入。那条磁带包含周围一切都相关的信息。也许意识就是那种底层,我们偶尔接入其中;同时又有你所谓封装在肉身里的一个版本。

对。

Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. That's it. and I think that's what's brought me closer to this craft of remote viewing and this world of the paranormal because it it feels like even with memory that I think there's some I think information exists outside of us and all our brain is doing is it's a read-write head, you know, just like you put a cassette in to a cassette player and it's just reading stuff as it goes by and it can write stuff to that thing. But you know the information is not in the cassette player but our brain I think is like the cassette player you know

And there's different cassettes out there that you can load and write to this this tape this magnetic tape that has all information of everything you know around us and and maybe that's that's just what consciousness is you know that substrate that we all kind of tap into from time to time, but there's also like a version that is encased, as you said, in this meat suit.

Yeah.

Michael Phillip
[00:53:23]

我也这么认为。现在我先不再展开另一段宏大的、存在论和秘传式漫谈,因为我想继续听你的故事和经历。除了第一次让你觉得“这确实无法解释”的重大命中,那已经是个极其诡异、可怕的时刻。你还遇到过其他异常或意外体验吗?有些项目里的遥视员会说,他们短暂感觉自己进入了目标,会有感官输入,比如闻到气味,突然尝到味道,或者出现其他类似印象。

Yeah. No, that's what I think as well, for sure. I won't go on another like lofty onlogical esoteric rant right now because I do want to like continue your your story and your experiences with this. Did you So, other than that like first really big hit that started to make you think, okay, that I really can't explain that away. That was a pretty [ __ ] uncanny moment right there. did did you have any other sort of anomalous or unexpected experiences?

Like sometimes remote viewers who are within these programs will talk about almost type experiences where they almost for a moment feel like they're in the target

Like they're having like sensory, you know, input like they're smelling things or suddenly they'll get tastes or they'll get

Other impressions like that.

Nelson Dellis
[00:54:13]

我听说过,但我从没经历过。有时我在脑中看到的东西很清晰,会突然击中我,让我非常有信心,但我从未像别人描述的那样,被场景拉进去、整个身体被包围、仿佛身临其境。不同人的体验方式不同,但对我来说不是那样。它肯定影响了之后的人生,仅仅因为它打开了“什么可能为真”的大门。所以后来我遇到更多共时性、更多无法解释的怪事,觉得确实有什么在发生。我不知道是因为我更开放、因此更容易注意,还是因为我连接了什么,所以发生得更多。

I've heard that and I never experienced anything like that. my my while sometimes it would be very clear what I was seeing in my mind and it would hit me and be I'd be very like confident in it. It never resonated with me when I heard people describe remote viewing as something that like pulled them in and their whole body was enveloped by the scene and they were there. I've never felt that. I think different people have different ways of experiencing it. but for me that was never it.

But I think it's definitely affected my life since then. Just I think by the mere fact that I it's opened the door to what I believe is possible. So I've had a lot more synchronicities in my life, kind of crazy things that I can't explain that I think there's a something going on. and I don't know if it's because I'm just noticing them more because I'm open to it or if it's happened to me more because I've tapped into something, you know?

Michael Phillip
[00:55:17]

对。

很难说。

兄弟,我觉得一直很难说,尤其当你在认识论上保持谦逊、对自己诚实。你必须从多个角度看事情,必须知道自己何时陷入确认偏误,也得知道自己是否因为不符合预想或欲望,就否定某些东西。我觉得这始终是走向真相、或者说只是活在现实中的一部分,即使你并不执着于抵达某种宏大的存在论真相,因为那可能是非常棘手的地带。我最近在播客里说过,可能是那一集、也许只在 Patreon 部分放出,我当时在和蔡斯·休斯聊。我不知道你认不认识他,他在行为研究领域很有名。

Yeah.

Hard to say.

Yeah, dude. I think it's always hard to say, especially if you're being epistemically

Humble and honest with yourself. You always have to look at multiple sides of things. You have to know when you're giving into confirmation bias. you have to know when you're you know

Dismissing the things that don't fit into your preconceived notions or desires like that. That's always a part I think of

Trying to be on a on a straight and narrow path toward the truth or or or just being in reality, you know, even if you're not obsessed with reaching some sort of massive onlogical truth because that can be really really thorny territory. I was just saying this in the podcast that I put out recently is that or may this actually might be in the p the only the patron part of it that I put out, but I was talking to that Chase Hughes guy. I don't know if you know him, but he's big in the sort of like behavior.

Nelson Dellis
[00:56:14]

哦,认识。我见过几段,他上过乔·罗根。

Oh, yes. Yes. I've seen a couple He was on Joe Rogan.

Michael Phillip
[00:56:17]

对。总之,我们聊到,人们走上追求智慧的道路时,总期待:“我会抵达某个地方。”但往往不是那样。那是一条更加曲折、迂回的路,让你拥有更多问题,用新方式重新思考,让新的可能性不断分形展开,却未必给你一个巨大的答案。它只是打开一张张可能性景观,带来新东西供你思考。对我来说,这场探索就是这样。如果我说得大胆一点,我觉得它本该如此。它不该把你带向某种无比确定的心境,让你自以为知道现实如何运作。那是巨大的陷阱,会把你引向非常糟糕的权威主义地带。

Yes. Yes. Anyway, yeah, but we we were talking about the idea that when people are on these paths toward wisdom, they expect, oh, I'm I'm going to arrive somewhere, right? and often times that's not what it looks like. It's this much more circuitous path toward like having really more questions and reconsidering things in a new way and just having all of these new possibilities fractal out that really don't get you to some giant answer.

They they just open up these vistas of possibilities and new things to consider. And I think that for me is what this whole quest has done. and and if I may be so bold, I think that's what it should do. I don't think it should lead you into some, you know, super certain state of mind where now you think you know how reality works. I think I think that's a massive massive trap that's going to lead you into incredibly authoritarian territory.

Nelson Dellis
[00:57:24]

对。我在这件事上很挣扎。因为我想相信,有时我会说:“哇,这里面有东西。”第二天又说:“等等,也可能是这样。”很有意思。我的一个朋友,黛比,我不知道你去年在 SI Games 有没有见过他。他算是我的同伴。

我们从大学起就是朋友,一起学物理。近几年我跟他讲过这些故事。他对 UFO 的兴趣远比我大。我也挺感兴趣,但他几乎达到克里斯那种知识深度。他去年跟我去了 SI Games,今年也去了。我们在 SI Games 总有种奇怪感觉:我们想相信这些东西,有时也真的相信,但坐下来又会质疑一切。今年我们去的时候说,干脆当成真的,先悬置怀疑,好好享受。很多参会者都充满敬畏,可我们就是做不到。

Yeah. Yeah. I struggle with that. cuz it's like I want to believe and at times I'm like, "Wow, there's something here." But then the next day I'll be like, "But wait, it could be this." And it's it's interesting. A friend of mine Debbie, I don't know if you met him last year at Syame. He was kind of my plus one.

We've been friends since college. We study physics together. And you know in recent years I've shared with him these stories and he's been he's way more interested in say UFOs than I am. I'm pretty interested but he like he's almost Chris level knowledgeable and deep into it and you know he came with me to SI games last year. He came with me this last year and you know we had this weird feeling at SI games where we're like we want to believe this stuff and sometimes we do but we sat here and we're just like questioning everything you know like and even this year we went and we're like let's just enjoy this as if it was real like let's just suspend belief and be like a lot of people are at this conference where they just are like in awe of everything and man, we just couldn't do it. We couldn't do it. Every

Michael Phillip
[00:58:41]

你们不该……

You shouldn't like Yeah.

Nelson Dellis
[00:58:43]

我不知道自己是否真的想做到。那像一次有趣练习,但我们对一切都太批判了。

And I don't I don't I don't think I want to, you know, it was just like a fun exercise, but like we were so critical about everything. And

Michael Phillip
[00:58:50]

我觉得这很合理。那里确实有很多值得质疑的东西。

抱歉打断。我想先说清楚,免得大家觉得我们不公平。

这不是在贬低 SI Games、Hakee 或任何主办者。只是当你处在这个领域,所有人都有自己想相信的东西,动机和纯粹程度各不相同,信息太多,无法全盘照收,也不可能全都是真的。

I think rightly so. There were a lot of things that were questionable there.

But and this is sorry to interrupt you. I just want to get this in because if people think we're being unfair, like this is no shade to

To Syame or to Hakee or anybody who's who's running it. It's just that when you're in this realm where you have all these people and they have all this stuff that they want to be true and people are operating from various intentions, various purities like it's just you can't it's a lot to sift through and it it can't all be true.

Nelson Dellis
[00:59:28]

对。SI Games 很棒,我很喜欢,我觉得是个很好的活动。但有些东西,我和朋友看来明显没什么特别,或者只是运气,甚至是彻底造假。现场大多数人却都在说:“哇,对,就是这个!太棒了!”鼓掌、欢呼。

我就是做不到。也许这反而限制了我,有人会说这是限制性信念。但最终,这类事情是个人旅程。我从没、甚至还没在自己 YouTube 频道上公开谈过,虽然我一直想谈,但绝不会站出来说它不真或百分之百真。每个人都要建立自己的连接,决定自己要不要全盘投入、完全退出,还是停在中间。因为除非亲自体验,否则你无法知道。这种事不能只凭别人怎么说就相信。

Yeah. Yeah. And Yeah. No, Sai games is great. I love it. I thought it was a great event, but you know, there's some things I thought that to me and my friend was very clearly nothing special or B just luck or a total sham. But everybody in the audience by and large you know is like, "Wow, yes, this is it. This is wow." Clapping their hands like cheering them on like this is

And I just I just couldn't do it. and maybe that's maybe something that's holding me back. You know, somebody could argue that's a limiting belief. but you know, I think I think ultimately with all this stuff, it's it's your own personal journey, man. Like I' I've never I've never been on I haven't even talked about it on my YouTube channel, even though I want to, but I would never stand there and say like this is not real.

This is 100% true. I think everybody needs to make their own connection to it or not. and decide for themselves whether they want to be all in, all out, partly in the middle. because you won't know until you just whatever you feel, you know, like through your experiences that you can't believe something based on what somebody tells you when it comes to this stuff, I think.

Michael Phillip
[01:00:44]

绝对同意。

说了这么多,你这个旅程后面还有更多章节,会进入一些相当……我觉得过去的你会说“不可能为真”的领域。具体说,你们并没有停在遥视。后来你们去了门罗研究所,参加 Gateway 静修,也有一些——我们就说是很有意思的经历吧。

Absolutely.

Yeah. And you know, all of that said that there are more chapters to this journey of yours that do get into some pretty some territory that I think previous versions of yourself would be like, "No, there there's no possible way that's true." and for for what I'm thinking of specifically is it doesn't this doesn't stop at remote viewing for you guys. You guys eventually go to Monroe Institute. You do the Gateway retreat. You have some, let's just call them very interesting experiences.

04

门罗研究所与四位数实验The Monroe Institute and the Four-Digit Experiment

01:01:18 – 01:18:32

Michael Phillip
[01:01:18]

整个静修期间都是如此。不过在那之前,如果还有别的具体遥视故事,你想讲就讲。我们不一定现在转话题。

Throughout the course of that retreat. but before we go on to that, if there are any other specific remote viewing stories

You want to tell, feel free. We don't we don't have to pivot.

Nelson Dellis
[01:01:28]

好。鲸鱼那次是转折点。那之后我也有几场评分很高的练习,因为一旦我真正对它开放,更多东西似乎就流了进来。不是每次都对,但好练习不少,只是没有哪次比鲸鱼更深刻。下一件大事,是项目整体无疾而终、那个人进监狱之后,我说我要先放一放。到 2021 年,我想,让我看看能不能重新进入。于是我开始大量读相关书籍。

我深入阅读这些文献,觉得:“这里面确实有东西。”后来我联系了当时那位联系人。我们一直是朋友,他自己在做体育博彩和遥视。我参加过他一些还算规律的挑战,记录自己的数据。后来他去做别的事,我则继续做体育博彩,直到今天,只是为了收集数据和统计,看看数字。我住在纽约州北部一个赛马小镇,夏天每天都有赛马,就在街那头。我加入了一个每周猜赢家的群。我并不总下注,有时会,更多是看自己能不能猜中。所以我经常做这件事,为了获得更多机会、更多数据,再汇总起来。

我在那里有过一些有趣经历。后来我和克里斯重新联系,我们和他的朋友韦斯一起上过一档播客。我把这个故事讲给他听,他说:“多讲讲。”我说:“克里斯,我教你。”然后我就去了蒙特利尔,教他遥视。这带动了他频道上的整个系列,我们开始采访一些经典遥视员,最后去了门罗研究所。因为我们见到了乔·麦克莫尼格尔,他某次说:“你们应该来参加 Gateway。”我们嘴上说:“好啊好啊。”我心里想:“我大概不会专门请一周假去参加冥想静修。”结果一年半后,门罗研究所办了一场专门面向内容创作者的静修,邀请克里斯,他也把我带上了。我们没能同一时间去,我晚了几周,但那扇门就这样打开了,而那是另一个世界。

很多人觉得 Gateway 过程和遥视直接相关,其实并没有。参加静修时,我想只有一次冥想稍微尝试了远距离感知,但总体上你是在进入深度冥想状态。有趣的事几乎必然会冒出来。至少九成人,即使是平时冥想的人,也不行。

我认为大多数每天做二十分钟正念冥想的人,永远到不了每天反复做双脑同步冥想所能达到的深度。静修期间,一天要做三到六次,每次四十分钟到一小时。很多时候你会“掉线”或者睡着,这并不反常。但对我来说,你恰恰需要到那里,才能看见心智中出现的认知或心理新异状态。因为关键区域就是入睡前的催眠态。如果你能在边界上保留一点元认知,非常奇怪的东西就会流进脑中。很多时候我会有一种感觉:此刻我似乎瞥见了外部信息。我常把它听成一种“清晰听觉”,像广播里的杂音。

像我在听一个电台,但没有意义。像你偶然听到某个七十岁老人的电话,完全没有上下文,不知道他在说什么。

所以有时我快睡着时,会接收到奇怪的东西,但永远无法归属或验证。如果要猜,我觉得那时自我和正常自我感变得非常安静,对外的感官也安静下来,于是你开始接入某种更微妙的东西,也许是非局域性,也许是某种无形感知。

我经历过很多次,不只在静修,有时晚上躺床上也会有那些怪东西。但不是我能控制、也不是我能测试的。

Yeah. No, I mean the whale one was the the turning point. I had other sessions that I scored pretty highly after that. because it came I don't know I feel like once I had that openness to it fully at that point a lot more came through. Not that I hit everything but I had a lot of good sessions but nothing I would say were incredibly more profound than that one. you know the next big thing was that it I after the whole program kind of fizzled out and the dude went to jail I was like yeah I'm going to I'm going to chill on this. and then later in 2021, I was like, "Oh, that was let me see if I can get back into it." And I started reading a lot of books about it.

And just kind of diving into the literature and I was like, "Oh, there's something here." And I actually reached out to the guy who was my point of contact there. We remained friends and he was kind of just doing his own thing with sports betting and remote viewing. and I took part in some of his somewhat regular challenges and kept stats for myself and then just kind of he eventually went and did his own thing and I kept on doing some of the sports betting.

I still do it to this day just personally to just gather data stats, you know, and look at the numbers. I live in a horse racing town here in upstate New York and so every summer we have horse races every day just down the street and I'm a part of a group where every week we I don't really bet sometimes I do but it's more just to see if I can guess the winner and so that's something I do a lot again just to

Get more opportunities to get more data and put it all together. so that's been an interesting I've had some interesting experiences there. And then me getting back in touch with Chris, you know, we were on a podcast with his buddy, Wes when they had a podcast together and remote viewing just came up because I shared this story with him

And he he was like, "Tell me more." I was like, "Chris, I'll teach you." You know, and next thing we know, I'm up in Montreal working at his u his teaching him remote viewing. and then it spurred this whole channel for him and we found ourselves talking to some of the classic remote viewers and

Ending up at the Monroe Institute, you know, because we went to go see Joe McMoneagle, you know, at some point he was like, "You should come and do the Gateway." And we're like, "Yeah, yeah, yeah." In my mind, I was like, "I don't know if I'd ever take a week off to do a meditation retreat." But they then had a year and a half later a retreat specifically for content creators and invited Chris. he was able to get me in there too.

I couldn't go the exact same time I went a couple weeks later, but that opened the door to that which was a whole other thing. Yeah. and for people, these two topics are very closely related a lot of the time like they think the gateway process has something directly to do with remote viewing and it doesn't really like but if you if you do the retreat I want to say there's like one meditation where they sort of dabble with the idea of

Distant perception but by and large you're really just going into these deep states of meditation where interesting things I think inevitably do arise just because we at least 90 I think even if you're a meditator

Still no

Because I don't think you're getting most people who are meditating I don't think if you're doing like 20 minute a day mindfulness thing I don't think you're ever going to get to the levels of depth that you can get to doing the meditate the Hemi-Sync meditation so many times a day I mean you're doing it three like three to six times a day 40 minutes to an hour at a rip usually. and I've said many times a lot of times you're quote unquote clicking out or falling asleep. that's not an abnormal thing.

But to me, that's actually where you need to go to start to see the degrees of cognitive or or mental novelty that can arrive in the mind because I think the special area is that hypnagogic state, man. Like if if you can maintain just a little bit of metacognition when you're right on that border, really weird [ __ ]

Starts to flow into your mind. And so often for me, I've had this feeling like I think that I am glimpsing external information right now. It's like a lot of times I'll hear it as sort of like they call it like clairaudient

Like chatter almost like I'm listening to a radio station,

But it's but it's meaningless. It it's like it's like if you just creeped in on some 70-year-old dude's phone call or something like you're not going to have any context to know like what they're talking about, right? Yeah.

So, so for me it's like that sometimes where I'll be really close to sleep and I'll just be getting weird stuff that I can there's I could never make attribution to or verify. But but I think when you get in those states, if I had to guess at what's happening, I think you're you're the ego and the normal sense of self has become so quiet. the external facing senses have become so quiet that you start to tap into something much more subtle that may be like non-locality or may be some sort of disembodied perception or something like that.

So, so I had a lot of that. not just there, but I mean sometimes just laying in bed at night having that weird stuff. Not anything that I'm in control of or that I could ever test. Yeah. But but but how did that

Michael Phillip
[01:07:25]

那静修期间总体上你发生了什么?因为有一个你和克里斯常讲的主要时刻,我肯定想再听一遍。但除此之外,如果还能想起,日复一日的冥想里有没有冒出什么奇怪的东西?

What happened for you during the retreat by and large? Because there there's sort of one main moment that you and Chris have talked about that I definitely

Would love to hear that story again. But but what about just the more kind of you know day in day out meditative weird kind of stuff bubbled up for you if you can remember?

Nelson Dellis
[01:07:43]

我一生中不太冥想。看你怎么定义。有时我会说记忆训练就是我的冥想。我坐着处理数字,专注创造图像,不想被干扰。如果想到别的,就要回到焦点,否则记忆数字的比赛时间就不够。比赛目标是在限定时间里记尽可能多,所以这也像把心智训练到只专注一件事,那个空间很像冥想。

Yeah, I never really meditated much in my life. I mean depends what you define as meditation. Sometimes I'd say like my memory practice is my meditation. You know, I'm sitting there trying to process numbers and focus on creating these images and you know, I don't want any distractions. If I think about something else, I got to come back to what I'm focusing on otherwise I lose time in this event to memorize numbers and the goal of the event is to memorize as much as possible. So training my mind to focus on one thing and that space is kind of like meditation.

Michael Phillip
[01:08:20]

当然。

Absolutely. Yeah.

Nelson Dellis
[01:08:21]

但我从不是那种坐下来闭眼冥想的人,而门罗研究所大概就是这样。我记得刚到那里,这个群体很古怪。我可能是最后到的人之一,大家已经三五成群聊天。我给妻子发消息说,我不知道自己是否该来这里,这不适合我,我不是这种人。但我还是给了它机会。几分钟内,当我开始讲故事,我意识到这些人真的想听。于是我心想:糟糕,他们是我的同类。

嗯。

一般来说,当你花时间与自己的念头和心智相处,就会有意外的东西出现。日常生活像老鼠赛跑,哪有时间?噪声太多,雷达不停接收看到、听到的东西,很少能坐在彻底安静、漆黑一片的环境里,听着与自身频率调谐的声波去探索。我觉得自然会有什么冒出来。那也是我期待的。

他们不承诺,但你会期待自己出体,这是主要焦点。对我来说其实只是很小一部分。

到那里后,最初几天,我想是第一天,我们刚开始做早期专注层级。我很快认识了一个朋友,对她说,我想试一件事。这很像我,我需要证据才能完全投入。我说:“我们各自回小房间前,你写一个四位数放在桌上,让我能看见。”她住楼上,我在角落。目标是飘过去看它。我整场练习都围着感知数字进行。一部分觉得不可能,随便猜算了;另一部分又认真对待,想看看是不是真有什么。每次在小房间里大约四十五分钟,可能更久。

我记得前 30 分钟,我什么都……

没有。我非常放松,像……

对,那是我一生中最放松的一周。

Yeah. So but I never been the kind to sit there, close my eyes and say oh you know and that's kind of what I expected at the Monroe Institute. I remember when I arrived it was such a quirky group of people. I think I was one of the last people to arrive and everybody was already chitchatting in their little groups and I remember texting my wife being like, I don't know if I need I should be here.

This is not for me. Like I'm not this kind of folk. And then I gave it a chance of course and within minutes I realized as I started to share my stories like these are people who want to hear these stories. I was like, "Oh, no. These are my people." You know, like

But

Yeah, I mean generally I think when you take the time to spend time with your thoughts and your mind something unexpected will come out of it cuz in the day-to-day rat race like when do we actually do that? You know, there's so much noise, other things that our, you know, our radar is perceiving, things we see, the noises we hear. You don't really get an opportunity to sit there in dead silence, in pure blackness. you know, with these sound waves that are in tune with your frequencies to explore that. and I think naturally something will come out. And that's that's what I was hoping for.

You know they promise not they don't promise but you have this expectation that you will go out of body and that's the main focus but that was like a small part of it for me really

But yeah when I got there I one of the first days I think day one

When we were just doing some of the early focus levels I said to a person that I had made friends with real quick that you know I wanted to try something this is very much like me that I need like proof you know before I can fully dive and I said, "Hey, before we go to our little CHEC unit," she was in an upstairs room. I was in the corner here. write down a four-digit number, put it on your desk, so I can see it. if the goal being to go and try to float over there and see it.

And my whole session was around trying to perceive that number. And, you know, part of it was just there's no way this I'll just guess whatever. But part of me took it seriously. Like I was like, "Okay, let me really see if this there's something here." And I remember spending, you know, each time you're in those CHEC units, it's about 45 minutes, maybe longer.

And I remember the first like must have been the first 30 minutes, I'm just

Nothing. I'm very relaxed. Like I

Yeah, most relaxed week of my life.

Michael Phillip
[01:11:03]

百分之百。

100%.

Nelson Dellis
[01:11:04]

我有四个孩子,生活不停歇,很少有时间那样休息。但当时脑中什么也没来。偶尔有小画面,但都像噪声。我一度想,算了,这事不会发生,我就……然后我几乎放松下来,放下期待。就在那时,我开始看到一些让耳朵警觉的东西。我先看到一堵墙。画面黑了一下,又有些斑块从黑暗里冒出来。一个像是墙,我记得自己的手碰上去,接着画面关闭。再打开时,我像是从木框角落往下看地板,地板上有些东西,但看不清。然后又关掉,再打开,我看到一张木桌。

它呈斜角,我无法移动视角,只能像固定镜头一样看。然后我看到一张卡片,一张写着四位数的便签。其中三位很清楚。离镜头最近、也就是最后一位,离得太近,失焦了。我看到了 173,但最后一位分不清是 4 还是 6。桌上还有其他东西,但不是焦点,我看不出是什么。我觉得就是它了,应该就是这个数字。然后我醒来,立刻写下来。我永远忘不了冲出房间的那一刻。她从小房间下楼,我把纸转向她,她给我看卡片。数字并不完全相同,是 173,但最后一位我忘了,得查笔记,我记得她的是 6,我的是 4。

对。

但在我看来,笔迹一样,纸一样,数字也一样,只是最后一位没看清,而且这次我没完全对。那又是一个让我停下来的时刻。

我觉得自己很需要它。那之后,我的信念闸门好像打开了。接下来一周发生并冒出了很多事。如果没有那次体验,我认为它们不会那么容易出现。我甚至想,会不会是某个更高版本的我在说:给他一点额外超自然酱料,让他启动起来。

You know, I have four kids and it's non-stop. So I don't really get much time to rest like that. But nothing was coming to mind. And I remember little visions here, but nothing. It felt like just noise. and I remember at one point just being like, whatever. Like, this isn't going to happen. I'm just going to And I almost like relaxed and let go of this expectation. And that's when I started to see like things that started to like ping my ears where I saw kind of a wall.

Things were black for a second. I started to see splotches of things coming through the black and one seemed like a wall. And I remember seeing my hand kind of touch it and then it closed off again. And then I remember it opening up again and seeing kind of the wooden corner of a frame kind of looking down at a floor and there was some stuff on the floor there. Couldn't tell what it was. And then it closed off again. And then it opened again and I was looking at a desk, a wooden desk.

And it was kind of at this oblique angle which I couldn't really move around. I didn't have control over that. That was just like a fixed shot. And I could see this card, this note card that had four digits on it. And three were very clear as if like the first the nearest one, which was the last one, was like too close to the lens. It was out of focus. So I saw 173 and then I wasn't sure if it was a four or a six. and I remember there were a couple other objects on the table, but I couldn't tell what it was.

It wasn't the focus. And I was like, I think this is it. I think this is the number. and I woke up and I remember writing it down immediately. And then I'll never forget the moment running out of my room and she's coming down the stairs from her CHEC unit and I turn my paper to her and she shows me the card and it's it's not the exact same number. It's 173, but the last digit actually I forget. I have to check my notes, but I think she had the six. I had a four.

Yeah,

But in my in my mind I was like I saw that is this the same handwriting, the same paper, the same digits, you know, off I couldn't see that last one and this one I didn't get it right. So it was that was another moment that kind of stopped me in my tracks and

I think I really needed that because after that moment it just like opened up my belief gates you know and the rest of the week so many other things happened and just came out that I don't think would have come out as easily if I hadn't had that experience. So, I wonder if it was some higher version of myself, something like saying here, give him a little bit of that extra paranormal sauce to get you going, you know?

Michael Phillip
[01:13:57]

这故事太震撼了。能带回来的数据如此明确,非常罕见,即使不是百分之百准确。因为重要的不只是数字,对吧?至少对你来说,还有看到时的主观层面:那就是我看到的物体。和我在扩展意识状态里看到的一样。看起来完全是同一个东西。所有这些对你来说都是更多数据。

而且你做这件事不是为了说服科学家和怀疑者。这是你亲身的体验,它的价值不可估量。太不可思议了,兄弟。我从没有过类似经历。对。

Yeah, it's so No, dude. It No, that's such a mind-blowing story. And to be able to come away with data like that is such a rare thing, even if it's not 100% true, because it's not it's not just the numbers, right? It's the other for you at least. It's the subjective aspects of seeing. Yes, that is the object I saw. That's that's like what I saw in that

Extended state of consciousness. Like it looks the same. All of that kind of stuff is more data for you. And you're not

Doing this to try to convince scientists and you know skeptics like this is your own experience. And the value of something like that for those purposes, I think, is immeasurably massive. So, so that's that's incredible, dude. And I've never had anything like that. Yeah.

Nelson Dellis
[01:14:50]

对。我很幸运,也很高兴能有那次经历,因为它非常关键地影响了我之后经历的很多事情。我再补一点,它让我更加确信那里确实有事发生。中途休息后,我问能不能看看她的房间,因为我还看到了一些别的细节。

我不知道那些是随机的东西,还是和所在位置相关。

我们去了,桌子果然是那张桌子。最有趣的是,我记得自己看到木框底部和地上的东西。那是她小房间的边缘。好笑的是,我们前一天刚到,大多数人还都把东西装在包里,或者慢慢往外拿。

可她到处都摊着东西。

Yeah. I'm very lucky and happy that I had that experience because it's

Been very pivotal in my in a lot of things that have happened to me after that. one thing I'll add to that story just to further con that further convinced me that something was happening there because after we had a little break at some point, I was like, can I can I see your room? Like, I just want to see cuz I saw some other aspects that

I don't know if they were just random things or stuff related to what where I was, you know?

And we go there and the table was the table. The most interesting thing to me was remember I saw kind of the bottom of the frame and stuff on the floor. it was the edge of her little CHEC unit. And the funny thing is we had just gotten there the day before and most people were still packed in their bags, you know, or slowly getting things out.

But she had [ __ ] everywhere.

Nelson Dellis
[01:15:47]

她对我说:“我就是这样收拾的。到地方后,我把所有东西往地上一扔。”所以我能看到那个只属于她的画面,非常独特。

对。

桌上我也说过还有其他东西。她当时还在哺乳,吸奶器和相关用品都放在桌上。

And she said to me, she's like, "That's the way I pack. I get to places and I just like throw everything on the floor." So it was like for me to have seen that you know specifically for her was unique right that and

Yes

Even on the table I had said there were other objects and she was still breastfeeding so she had her pumps

And paraphernalia on the table.

Michael Phillip
[01:16:11]

她的宝宝也在吗?

Was her baby there?

Nelson Dellis
[01:16:12]

不不不。但你知道,

No, no, no, no. But you know when

Michael Phillip
[01:16:14]

她只是带着好玩?

She just brought it for fun?

Nelson Dellis
[01:16:15]

不是,但你哺乳时要持续泵奶。

No, but you when you're breastfeeding you want to keep pumping.

Michael Phillip
[01:16:17]

哦,得保持供应。

Oh, you got to keep it going. Yeah, you got otherwise keep it flowing.

Nelson Dellis
[01:16:20]

对,要不然会堵。女性很讨厌那样,因为奶会被倒掉。

你知道,而且产奶很费劲。

Yeah, exactly. I wouldn't know women hate that because you're dumping the milk which is like

You know

You sells man and it's a lot of effort to make it.

Michael Phillip
[01:16:32]

所以兄弟,那里肯定有人……门罗研究所肯定有人会……

So dude someone there had to I mean someone at Monroe Institute would have

Nelson Dellis
[01:16:37]

对。我不知道,也许她放进冰箱保存,带回家了。总之,那是一次超现实体验。再加上这一层细节,让我觉得“好吧,这非常具体,很厉害”。我不知道自己在做什么。我从没感觉自己离开了身体、飘过天花板,从没有。我只是瞬间就在那里看见那些东西。所以我不知道那算不算遥视,算不算某种出体。我不知道,真的不知道。

Yeah. I don't know maybe she put it in I don't know she put it in the fridge and kept it and took it home. I don't know. but anyways, it it was a surreal experience and having that extra layer of kind of like, okay, this was very specifically this was awesome. I don't know what I was doing. I don't know if I never felt like I was out of body, like I left my body, floated through the ceiling. I never got that. I was like instantly there

Seeing those things. So, I don't know if that's remote viewing. I don't know if that's a version of out of body. I don't know. I don't know what it was.

Michael Phillip
[01:17:13]

对。我觉得名字没那么重要。名字只有在试图理解我和另一个人是否经历了同样现象时才重要,那时命名才有帮助,因为你大概能判断这是某种可训练的能力或技术。不过说到它与出体的区别,我觉得只要你在这些领域多玩几次,就会发现意识还有别的面向。它们可能退化,也可能极其微弱、未开发,因为我们根本不承认其存在。就像你身体某个部位有块极小的肌肉,你从不知道它存在,直到做了某种怪动作,才发现天哪,那里怎么这么酸。

大概类似吧。不过,我跟你说过我的出体故事吗?

Yeah. Yeah. And I think the name is less important, right? The only time I think that stuff's important is when you're trying to understand is the phenomenology I experience the same as this other person, right? Like that's that's when naming becomes helpful because then you know, okay, this is probably a specific capacity or technique that I can train or whatever. but yeah, to your point of the difference between that going out of body, I think again you start to if you play in these realms more, you realize that there are these other aspects of consciousness that are either extremely maybe they're vestigial, maybe they're just incredibly weak and undeveloped because we don't even recognize their existence. like some tiny muscle in some part of your I don't know some part of your anatomy that you absolutely never even know exists till you do some weird exercise and you're like oh my god like I don't even know what that is that's sore right now it's

It's it's kind of like that maybe but yeah did I ever tell you my obbe story

Nelson Dellis
[01:18:27]

没有,私下没说过。我大概听过零碎版本,但很想听完整的。

No not personally I think I caught it in bits and pieces but I'd love to hear it

05

出体体验与记忆心流Out-of-Body Experience and Memory Flow

01:18:32 – 01:35:28

Michael Phillip
[01:18:32]

我讲过很多次,但必须告诉你,因为这对我来说也是一次存在论级别的重新定位。你大概已经看出我的立场。大多数听节目的人也知道,我很开放,觉得这些方向有价值。我对西方秘传、东方秘传都非常着迷。相关文献里有关于精微体,以及听起来和门罗研究所、罗伯特·门罗所描述的体验几乎无法区分的内容。所以我很开放。但开放是一回事,亲自体验又是另一回事,就像我们聊遥视时说的。那是静修最后一个完整日。

我们已经做完所有专注层级。我也经历过一些更微妙的事,就像之前提到的那样,但没有哪次让我觉得“我马上要出体了”。我确实感觉自己成功感受到那些波,因为训练会让你试着感受精微体或非物质的波穿过身体。我确实感受到了。冥想时常有几乎摇晃的感觉。

但我从没觉得自己能控制它,也从未觉得“这肯定是我的精微体要升起来了”之类。

Well I've I've told it so many times but I have to tell I have to tell you this because it for me this was one of those ontologically reorienting moments because again you probably have gathered what my disposition is probably most people listen listening know I'm open-minded I think there's value in these directions incredibly fascinated with western esotericism eastern esotericism all of that stuff and within the history the corpus of those writings stuff about subtle body stuff stuff about it sounds indistinguishably similar from the kind of stuff that purportedly goes on at Monroe Institute happened to Robert Monroe whatever.

So I'm open-minded to it but that's one thing and actually experiencing it is a totally different thing just as we were talking about before with the remote viewing. So I'm on the last full day of the retreat.

So you've we've done all the focus levels. I had had a bunch of more subtle things happen kind of like I was alluding to before, but nothing where I'm like, "Yeah, I'm about to go out of body." I I did feel like I was succeeding in feeling the waves, right? Because they train you to try to feel this

The waves of the sort of subtle body or non-physical whatever going through. I did feel that. I would often feel this almost kind of rocking sensation during the meditations

But never felt like I had any control of it or like yeah this is definitely my subtle body about to lift off or anything.

Michael Phillip
[01:20:07]

我们做的是整个静修中最长的冥想之一,好像叫 Superflow,会依次经过专注层级 10、12、15、21。

So we're doing I think it's the longest meditation of the whole retreat. I think it was called superflow where you're going through all you're going 10 12 15 21.

Nelson Dellis
[01:20:18]

对,我喜欢那个。

Yeah. I love that one.

Michael Phillip
[01:20:19]

对。我非常放松。后来我在日志复盘里写,感觉像躺在一条懒人河上漂着,几乎失重,但不是要出体那种,只是极度放松。

因为静修已经进行得很深,我大概已经放下任何期待,不再想得到什么。我只是……

那时我最后才会想到的是:我会在这次静修、这次冥想里出体。

他们还会做一件事,我想只有那次。他们会在冥想中把音频音调完全撤掉,进入彻底静默。

And then Yeah. I love Yeah. I was so relaxed. I felt like I think the way that I put it in my little journal check-in afterward was I felt like I was on some kind of just lazy river just floating just almost like weightless relaxed not weightless like I was going out of body but just so relaxed

And I and because it was so deep into the retreat I had sort of

I think I had relinquished any expectations of wanting anything. I was just like

Last thing on my mind is yeah I'm gonna go out of body in this retreat in this meditation.

So they also do this and I think this is the only time they do this. They just drop the tone out into complete silence in that meditation as well.

Michael Phillip
[01:21:02]

我大概在三分之二,也许一半的位置彻底掉线,隐入虚无。可之后,兄弟,那是我唯一一次经历这种事:我清醒地出现在另一个房间。感觉完全真实,没有任何异常或超自然之处。我就站在某个房间里,看着窗外一片树林。直到今天我依然困惑,因为我不知道那是不是门罗研究所的某个地方,那里有很多类似的场景。

它有种七十年代的感觉。房间本身是米色,整体是七十年代的风格。

And I completely I want to say two-thirds of the way, maybe halfway, I completely clicked out. Just faded into nothingness. But then after that, dude, one and only time I've experienced this, I was lucidly present in a different room. Like just like this felt totally real. There was nothing abnormal. There was nothing supernatural about it. I just felt like I was standing in some room and I was looking out the window at sort of like a wooded scene.

And to this day, I'm confused about that because I don't know if this was at Monroe Institute somewhere because there are a lot of places like that. Yeah.

And it felt kind of 70s. Like the room it felt the room itself felt sort of like beige and kind of 70s vibe.

Nelson Dellis
[01:21:51]

所以你不认识,但又有种熟悉感。

So you didn't recognize it, but it had a familiar feel.

Michael Phillip
[01:21:54]

对,甚至不是那种熟悉,好像我知道自己在哪里。但事后想,它也可能是门罗研究所的某处。我不知道。

然后像任何人都会做的那样,我开始质疑:我不知道自己怎么来的,为什么在这个房间,我在做什么,发生了什么?当这个念头继续下去,我想起来,不,我正在小房间里冥想。刚想到这一点,我就回到小房间,可那波动的感觉变得异常强烈,像嗡鸣、震动、电流感。

强到我心想:“哇,我感觉自己好像要相位转移了,太疯狂。”然后我试着身体动一下,试着坐起来,因为这太奇怪了。就在那时,我完整地升了起来,开始向上漂浮。

像卡通一样,完全就是你以为的那种感觉。你像一团失重、振动嗡鸣的物质,几乎像水,或者带电流的水。紧接着立刻被恐惧接管。那不是理性的“没事,别怕”,完全不是。你内心深处有某种东西知道这不对。我把它比作:你不知道水是什么,别人突然把你扔进水里,你不会游泳。就是那种感觉。

你完全震惊,对正在发生的事毫无熟练度。

对。

所以我吓坏了,但还保有一点理智,想:转身,看看自己,做确认动作。

对。

但周围一片漆黑。另一件事是,我参加过死藤水静修,也经历过很大的剂量。所以静修前我一直好奇:如果能出体,会不会觉得熟悉?会不会像迷幻体验?会不会有分形结构向我展开?我至今不能确定答案。因为我惊讶地发现,自己仍然像身处一个黑暗房间。

并没有获得透视之类的能力。

但我有一种无法否认的感觉:我的身体,或者非身体、精微体,升起来了。

那东西沉重又笨拙,仍像身体的轮廓。我开始恐慌,因为无法控制它。我真的开始呼救:“拜托,帮帮我,求你们,任何东西,救救我。”因为我不知道怎么回去。太可怕了。持续得也不长,也许一两分钟。

Yeah. Not not even familiar like I knew where it was, but in hindsight it's like this could be

Somewhere at Monroe Institute, maybe. But I don't know. Yeah.

But then, you know, as one would, I started questioning like, I don't know how I got here. Like, why am I in this room? What am I doing? What's going on? And then once I continued that train of thought, I remembered, no, I'm in the CHEC unit meditating. And then as soon as I thought that, I'm back in the CHEC unit, but the waving sensation was going insanely strong. It was like a humming like vibratory electrical like kind of feeling almost. And it was it was crazy strong.

So crazy that I was like, "Whoa, I'm like feel like I'm phasing here. This is wild." And then I tried to physically move, like physically sit up because it was so strange. And as I did that, I just had a full-blown liftoff. And it just like started rising up

Cartoon level of like exactly what you think it would feel like, man. It's just like you feel like this weightless mass of vibratory humming almost like a watery almost like electrically charged water or something and you're just like like it it just felt like that immediate terror takes over like it's not it's not a rational oh just get you know just get it's not like that. It's completely like there's something deep deep inside of you that knows this is not cor this is not right.

It it I've likened it to you know, imagine you don't know what water is and someone just chucks you in the water and you don't know how to That's what it feels like. It's just

You're totally just shocking not fluent in whatever you're doing.

Yeah.

So, I'm freaking out, but I also have enough presence of mind to think, turn over, look at yourself, do the confirmation thing.

Yeah.

But meanwhile, it's totally dark. I don't you know this is the other part of it is like I've done ayahuasca retreats I've done heroic doses of things. So I was curious to see like if I could go out of body this is one of my curiosities before the retreat. If I go out of body would it seem familiar? Would it feel psychedelic? Would it feel like oh there's this fractally stuff revealing itself to me? I don't know the answer to that for sure because but also I was struck by how it still just felt like I was in a dark like a dark room.

It didn't feel like I was gaining these abilities to see through stuff or anything like that.

But I had the undeniable sensation of I have physically

Or non-physically or subtle body lift off type thing.

And I could it was just like this heavy awkward thing. It did still feel like the outline of a body, but then I started freaking out because I couldn't get control of it. And I started literally just calling for help. Like, please, please help me. Please, some anything. Please help me. Cuz I could not figure out how to get back in. And it was scary. And it didn't even last that long. Like maybe a minute or two.

Michael Phillip
[01:25:00]

当我开始喊“救救我”后,我感到自己往下沉,最后重新出来,感觉像刚经历车祸。心跳飞快,我只想说:天哪。我从床上或小间里一下弹起来,提前结束冥想,下楼去了那里的休息区。没去过门罗研究所的人可能不知道,有个像客厅的区域,大家在那里复盘、坐下分享。我一直在来回踱步,不停摇头,只想说:我靠,我靠。

这是真的。

对。然后我坐下,等所有人出来。大家都说:“兄弟,你脸色好苍白。”我说:“是啊。”我讲了故事,所有人都震惊地说:“天哪,太疯狂了。”

再次声明,我不想显得自己特别。我完全像是踩到香蕉皮滑进那个状态,不知怎么就到了那里。但最后我是那场静修里唯一完整经历这种事的人。至今不知道原因。我不觉得自己特别擅长,后来也没再发生。所以那就是我的经历,这种事绝对排在我最震撼经历的前列。它不是“也许吧”,不是“我能理解你为什么觉得你出体了”。它非常切身,你要么真的经历过,要么没有。

我不是说没有其他类型的扩展认知,或者超越感官的非物质感知。但那些不一样,这是一件很具体、可能发生在某人身上的事。

But once I started that help me, help me. I felt the sensation of sinking down again. And then I just eventually reemerged and it felt like I had just gotten out of like a car wreck or something. Like my heart was racing and I was like, "Holy shit." And I just like sprung up out of bed out out of the CHEC unit. I just left the meditation early and I just went downstairs to the

For the people who haven't been to Monroe Institute. There's like a living room sort of area where you do the debriefs where everybody sits down and shares. And I was just pacing around and I was just like shaking my head just like what the [ __ ] What the [ __ ]

This is real.

Yeah. And then I just sat there and waited for everybody to come out and everybody was like, "Dude, you look pale." And I'm like, "Yeah." And yeah, so I shared the story and everybody was just like, "Holy [ __ ] that's crazy." And I

And I I again preempt this as always to not try to make myself sound special. I absolutely feel like I slipped on a banana peel into that state. Just somehow wound up there. But I w up being the only person on that retreat who had the full-blown thing like that. and I still to this day don't know why. I don't feel like I was particularly good at it or or it it hasn't happened again since. So yeah, that was the experience and it's it's one of those things where

I definitely rank it amongst the most holy [ __ ] That's not like a that's not like a maybe. That's not like a, oh, I can see how you would think you went out of body. It's it's it's very visceral and very like you either did that or you didn't do that.

And I'm not saying there's there's other there's not other stuff because I think there are other kinds of extended cognition or seeing non-physically beyond what you can see with your senses or sense with your senses. But those are it's different. It's different than that. Like that's that's a specific thing that one can have happen to them.

Nelson Dellis
[01:26:58]

对,很有意思。事后你有时会想:这是不是我的想象?别人也会质疑你,说你只是想象或做梦。但从我的经历看,听你描述也一样,确实有区别。它感觉是真实的,我不知道,就是非常不同。我不知道还能怎么形容,但两者不一样。

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, it's interesting and you're left kind of thinking sometimes like is this just my imagination? And someone might question you and say like you just imagined it or you dreamt it, you know, but in the experiences I've had and it sounds like you like there's a difference like you can it it it feels real, you know, like

You can I don't know, it just feels very different. I don't know how else to put it, but it's not the same.

Michael Phillip
[01:27:26]

同意。我觉得真正区别在于,心智中似乎存在某种分隔,而且有充分理由。通常做梦时,甚至像门罗那句著名说法——我们每晚都会出体——我不知道是否同意,也不反对,我就是不知道。但也许唯一真正的区别,是我们在那个状态里通常不会进行元认知。我们无法说:“我是尼尔森,我有四个孩子,我……”我们只是存在于更微妙的意识状态,也许是星光态,我不知道哪个词最好。但似乎有一种技术或觉知模式可以培养、发现,让你能在那些状态里元认知,真正记住并体验那些事。

同时自我仍在线。我觉得这是其中一部分,也是双脑同步在做的事,因为它试图让左右半球共振。

按我的理解,清醒意识基本上是左半球主导,自我住在那里,逻辑性的“先做这个、再做那个”主要也在那里。也许就这么简单。我不知道,但我觉得那里肯定有点东西。

I agree. I agree. And I think the real difference here is there's a there's some kind of division in the mind that I think is there for a good reason, right? I think normally if we have a dream or if we maybe even, you know, because Monroe famously says we're going out of body every night kind of kind of thing, which I don't know if I agree with, I don't disagree. I just don't know. But maybe the only real difference is we don't we're not metacognating when we're in that state normally.

We don't have the ability to be like I'm Nelson. I have four kids in a what we're just we're existing in this more subtle state of consciousness or or maybe it's like a an astral state or a I don't know what the best vernacular is for it but it seems like there's some technique or mode of awareness that one can cultivate or discover or whatever where you can metacognate in those states and you can actually remember the stuff and experience the stuff

With the ego still online and I think that's part of it and I think that's part of what Hemi-Sync is doing because it's literally trying to bring the right and left hemispheres into resonance

And normally I think that's a you know waking consciousness from my understanding is a largely left hemisphere kind of thing like that's where the ego lives that's where the I first I do this then I do that the logical kind of

Mind mainly exists and maybe that's just what it is. Maybe it's as simple as that. I don't know. But but I think there is there's something there for sure.

Nelson Dellis
[01:29:08]

对。太疯狂了。

嗯,这个故事很酷,也很有意思。我之前没听过。

Yeah. [gasps] It's crazy, man.

Yeah,

That's a cool story. Very interesting. I hadn't heard that before.

Michael Phillip
[01:29:15]

确实如此。但它也很好地说明,这类体验会打开更多问题,对吧?它是真实一步。就像我现在几乎能确定那是真的,程度大约等同于:如果此刻一个男人冲进房间亲我一下,我会说:“搞什么?”

你感受到了,也看到了。

至少对我的感知而言,现实程度相同。但除此之外,我什么也不知道。我不知道这是否证明罗伯特·门罗《出体之旅》里的一切、或某个 YouTube 上的人说的一切都是真的。

就是这种事。但它极其迷人。我一直在想再深入那个世界,想再回门罗研究所探索更多。

你有没有试着……按你的生活方式,大概非常难,因为你有家庭、有记忆训练,你看起来是个极其忙碌的人。但事后有没有继续冥想?

It it is. But it's it's also definitely a great example of how it just opens up so many more questions, right? Like it it's it's a real step. It's a real like, yep, I'm I'm I'm about about as sure as I can be that was real in a in the same way where if a guy just like ran in the room and like kissed me on the cheek right now and I was like, "What the fuck?"

You felt it and you saw it.

It would be the same level of reality for my perception at least. so I don't know anything else other than that though. I don't know if that then vindicates everything in Journeys Out of the Body by Robert Monroe and whatever this guy says on YouTube and right,

You know, it's it's it's one of those things, but it yeah, it's it's super fascinating and I think all the time about trying to go

Back deeper into that world and I would like to go back to Monroe and explore

More more things for sure. did did you try to I mean, I guess with your lifestyle, it's probably really really hard because you have you have the family, you have the memory stuff. It seems like you're just an incredibly busy person, but did you try to continue the meditations afterward at all?

Nelson Dellis
[01:30:25]

试过。后来因为生活琐事中断了。我抽不出时间不受打扰地坐着或躺着。即使有时间,也总有人会敲门喊:“爸爸,帮我擦屁股。”

只能说好吧。即使没人来,知道他们随时可能来,也会彻底破坏放松。我现在正处在人生这个阶段。但旅行时,有时我没有什么必须回应的事,就会做,也会在飞机上做。

I did. it fell off just cuz life got in the way and I just didn't have the time to sit and lay there without distractions. It's like even if I had the time, inevitably someone's going to knock on my door and be like, "Daddy, wipe my ass." You know,

It's like, "Okay." And even if they don't, like knowing that potentially could happen just totally disrupts any relaxation. I'm just in that phase of life right now. But there have been times when I did have, you know, I'm traveling. I have nothing to answer for at this moment. And I would do it or I do it on a plane.

Nelson Dellis
[01:31:01]

这是我总会回来的事,因为那一周,你所做的就是这件事。那不是现实生活。但你能看到,当你只专注一件事、没有干扰时,它有多强大。所以这增强了获得那些体验的能力。知道它在那里、知道抵达它需要什么,也很好。如果你能让其中一部分发生,能接触一点点,也足够好了。所以我偶尔会用。坦白说,我把在门罗学到的方法归功于自己赢得 2024 年美国记忆锦标赛。

决赛前,我们有三个人。距离上台只有十到十五分钟,我们短暂休息,然后要上去记大量牌,争夺冠军。我记得自己非常紧张,因为我第五次夺冠是在 2021 年,那是我一直想达到的目标,做到后我觉得结束了。但后来有种感觉,那一年也是我去门罗的年份。我像听到某种召唤:我觉得我还能再来一次。可到决赛时,我想压力太大了,要是搞砸多丢人,我为什么还来?那个预感错了。总之,我只想逃离。我记得自己做了整套专注层级 21。

And it's something that I come back to, because I

In that week, man, it's all you're doing. And that's not real life, you know. but you see how powerful it can be when you focus on one thing and don't have any distractions. So, that I think adds to the ability to have these experiences. but it's nice to know that's there. and what it took to get there. And if you can make a portion of that happen, you know, you can access a little bit of it and that's that's nice enough.

So yeah, I've used it from time to time. I honestly credit that what I learned at Monroe for how I won the 2024 US Memory Championship.

I remember before the final event it's me and it's three of us in the finals. we have to we're about to go out in like 10 15 minutes. we get a little break before we have to go on stage and memorize a bunch of cards and it's for the championship. And I remember being so nervous because I was like I had one last when my fifth time in 2021 and that was like I'd been aiming to win five times. I did it.

I was done. And then I had a feeling like and this was the same year that I did Monroe. So there was like a calling that came to me where I was like I think I got one more in me. but at that point be I'm like finding myself in the finals. I was like, there's a lot of pressure right now, you know, like if I [ __ ] this up, like how embarrassing, you know, like and why did I even bother coming out? And that premonition was wrong. And but anyways, I just wanted to escape. And I remember going to I did a whole focus 21 thing.

Michael Phillip
[01:32:37]

哇。

Oh wow.

Nelson Dellis
[01:32:37]

做了个快速版本,因为完整录音很慢。我练过几次更快抵达那里。我记得自己非常平静。你们静修时有没有让你们不带双耳节拍,在外面练习?

The whole a fast a fast one. cuz that one's slow if you listen to the whole recording. But I had practiced a couple times kind of getting to there quicker and I remember being so calm and I don't know in your retreat did they ever have you do it outside without the binaural beats?

Michael Phillip
[01:33:01]

有。我们有个练习,好像是出去散步,试着不带音频进入专注层级 10 左右。我不确定。我确实认为神经系统和大脑会在某种程度上内化它,但如果你现在让我进入专注层级 10,我不知道自己能不能做到。你觉得自己有这个能力吗?

We Yeah, we did this exercise where we went for a walk I think and we tried to be in focus 10 or something without the Yeah. I and I have no idea like I do think to some degree the nervous system and the brain ingrains that stuff but I if if you said hey get into a focus 10 I don't know I don't know if I would be able to do you feel like you have that ability

Nelson Dellis
[01:33:21]

不像那样。但我也自然、缓慢地想象罗伯特·门罗的话和不同步骤,有过很棒的体验。

我记得有一次,我放着他的录音,但不一定按步骤走。到那个阶段,只要播放双耳节拍,就像巴甫洛夫式反应,我的心智会自动回到那个状态。那次就是这样。我按步骤进入,然后周围世界……我像身处《黑客帝国》,尼奥终于获得能力,世界随着他一活动而弯曲。一切都在振动、扭曲,我极其平静。然后我走上舞台,拿起牌,一切都非常顺畅,最后赢了。很大一部分胜利来自我能让自己平静,并把自己带到另一个地方。我不知道那是什么,但

Not like that but I did have some awesome experiences just doing it naturally slowly just kind of imagining Robert Monroe's like words and the different steps

And I remember doing that I had one of the I was playing one of his recordings but not kind of necessarily going through the steps. There's something now at this point when I play those binaural beats like it's like a Pavlovian response. My mind kind of goes back to that and that's what happened. And I did the steps to get to where I was and I was

The world around me. I felt like the Matrix, you know, where it's just like Neo finally gets his powers and like the world like bends as he flexes and everything was like vibrating and like warping and stuff and I just felt so calm and I remember going out on the stage and grabbing those cards and you know just so smooth you know and I ended up winning. So I think a big part of that win was being able to calm myself and kind of take myself to another place. I don't know what that was, but

Michael Phillip
[01:34:35]

太酷了。太迷人了。你真是这些事情里的有趣案例,因为你可能是唯一一个开始进入超感官、罗伯特·门罗和 Gateway 领域的精英记忆运动员。所以非常有意思。我想回到刚才说的“蛇咬自己尾巴”的想法。你之前是不是做过一次演讲?我好像错过了第一次 SI Games,但你是不是谈过?我记得你讲的是普通记忆,对吧?

但你是不是也谈过:当你进入非常寂静的意识状态,最终几乎不需要执行记忆流程,

That's so cool, man. Yeah, that's so that's so fascinating. I mean, again, you're just such this interesting case study for all of this stuff because you're you have to be one of the only elite memory athletes to ever start to go in this realm of psi and of

Robert Monroe and Gateway. So, it's just super interesting. And so I want to come back to this idea now of like the snake eating its tail that we were talking about before because I think didn't you give a talk on this and I think I missed it at the first SI games but but didn't you give a talk on I know I know you were talking about just memory stuff in general

Right

But didn't you give a talk about this how it seems like you eventually when you get into these very still states of consciousness it's almost just like you know without doing the memory routine or or it's like you can almost

06

记忆宫殿与古代记忆术Memory Palaces and Ancient Mnemonics

01:35:28 – 01:50:14

Michael Phillip
[01:35:28]

因为你几乎能直接……讲完这个,我们进入实际的记忆技术吧,毕竟还没聊过。

那是一个流程,对吧?刚学的时候很笨拙,但很直观,几分钟内谁都能做到一点。

但成为专家后,就像你展示的那样,你能做得非常快,训练自己直接这样思考、记忆,砰砰砰,非常快。

但按我的记忆,你几乎说你有时可以不做流程,直接知道。是这个意思吗?

Because so after this let's get into the actual memory technique because we haven't even done that at all but

But it's a it's a process right it's a it's this process that you that when you first learn it it's clunky but it's intuitive and everybody can kind of do it to some extent within a few minutes

But when you become an expert at it I would imagine as you've demonstrated that you can do this very quickly and treat yourself and train yourself to just think like this and memorize stuff

Boom boom boom really really fast.

But from my memory, it was almost like you were saying you can almost just not do it and know sometimes. is that what is that what you're saying?

Nelson Dellis
[01:36:08]

对。这就是我之前说的记忆心流状态。我只是看着自己的心智做事,甚至不觉得自己在参与、在应用技术,我就是知道答案,信息像被递给我。并非每次都如此,但很多时候会。我现在正处在一个阶段,以前只为了记忆比赛训练牌、数字、名字,如今我在记很多自己感兴趣的实际表格,纯粹为了乐趣。我发现,因为我教很多人,必须一步步解释所有技术;但有时,比如今天我复习一些东西,我完全没有应用自己讲过的技术。我只是看着它,它自己就留住了。

Well, that's that's what I was saying earlier when I had that experience of being in the flow state with memory where I'm just watching my mind do this thing and it's like I don't even feel like I'm participating and doing the technique and I just know what it is. like the information is given to me. It doesn't always feel like that, but there's plenty of times when it does. And I'm actually going through a time right now where I'm memorizing like I used to train just for memory competition.

So cards, numbers, names, all this stuff. But now I'm just memorizing a lot of stuff that I'm interested in like actual tables of things

For my own enjoyment. and I'm finding like because I coach a lot of people and I have to explain all the techniques like step by step, but sometimes even today I was I was reviewing some things. I'm just like I'm not applying any of the techniques that I talk about. Like I'm just looking at it and it's it's staying with me.

Nelson Dellis
[01:37:05]

我不想给人留下我是录音机的印象,不是。我的大脑显然在做事情,但更像一种“知道”的感觉。我看一份清单,组织它,大概也视觉化它,然后它就记住了。太疯狂了。我以前没有这种信心,过去我会说:“好,我能记,我得应用技术,坐在这里想象等等。”现在则是我知道流程,坐下十分钟、十五分钟就能搞定。所以经过练习,它在某种程度上变得自动。但这也很难想,因为你思考自己到底在做什么,反而会自我破坏。说清楚,我是在指向一种想法:你获取知识的方式

And I don't want to give the impression that I'm like this tape recorder. I'm not. because obviously my brain is doing something but it's it's more of like a knowing feeling like it's just I can look at this list, organize it, visualize it, I guess, and it's there. which is wild. Like I didn't used to have that confidence with being able to memorize a lot of information like that. I used to be like, "Okay, I can do this.

I got to apply this technique and sit here and visualize blah blah blah." But now it's just like, "Oh yeah, I know the process. let me sit down and I'll have it in, you know, 10 15 minutes. so yeah, it's it's it's something that with practice has become in a way automatic. but it's I don't know. It's it's such a head [ __ ] to to think about like what I'm actually doing anymore. Yeah. I try not to think about it because then I psych myself out. And to be clear, I'm I'm gesturing toward the idea that you're somehow gaining knowledge

Michael Phillip
[01:38:10]

几乎是非局域的,或者说像……

In a way that is almost like non-local or in a way that it's like

Nelson Dellis
[01:38:14]

当然,百分之百。我的意思是,没有……好吧,我本来想说……我不想把自己的说法强加给你。但如果你是这个意思,那也正是我的意思。

Sure. 100%. I mean, I'm saying without Okay, I was going to say I Yeah, I don't want to say I don't want to imply that's what you're saying if that's not what you're saying, but if it is what you're saying, it is what I'm saying.

Michael Phillip
[01:38:23]

太迷人了,兄弟。

我顺便提一个东西,作为对话中的另一个兴趣点,因为我知道你还没深入研究。我发给你,是因为我想:兄弟,你研究信息和记忆,必须知道它存在。

That's so fascinating, dude.

I'll just bring this up as a as an aside and as another just fascination for the conversation because I know it's not something you've dove into, but I sent it to you just because I was like, "Dude, you're an information and memory guy and you need to know that this exists."

Nelson Dellis
[01:38:41]

哦,对。

Oh, right.

Michael Phillip
[01:38:42]

有一本魔法书叫《Ars Notoria》。我现在不深入秘传兔子洞,但西方秘传魔法的一个重要支流是所罗门传统。传说中,建造第一圣殿的所罗门王,实际上驱使天使和恶魔替他建造圣殿。后来有些魔法书声称自己才是真正的原始文本。

什么是 grimoire?

魔法书,就是一本魔法文本。

文本,好。

比如你查 Goetia,或者随便怎么念,就会看到我讲的东西。最著名的是《所罗门的小钥匙》。但还有很多其他文本。里面要求做各种净化、仪式,讨好灵体、天使或恶魔,让它们替你办事,流程非常繁复。

但有一本特别有意思,我觉得你会感兴趣,就是《Ars Notoria》。

它自称属于所罗门传统,并声称这是所罗门获得全部世俗知识的方法。总之非常有意思。这本书据说涉及几种机制。我不是专家,只是前几天听了些东西、看了些图片。其中一种机制是有天使智能直接把信息给你;另外还有图表,里面有文字和图像的象形图,你需要阅读。我不知道这些图表里是字面意义上要记忆的信息,还是它属于向天使智能祈求的一部分。

我觉得你至少可以浅挖一下,因为历史档案里又有一种声称能获得超人认知、知识和记忆能力的东西。

But there's there's essentially this grimoire called the Ars Notoria. And I won't I won't go down a deep esoteric rabbit hole really right now, but one of the main strains of western esoteric magic with a K is the Solomonic strain. So the the legend essentially is that King Solomon who built the first temple actually prostrated all of these or he he basically used all these angels and demons to build the temple for him is the story. Okay. And then there are these grimoires that like claim to be the actual text.

What is a grimoire?

A grimoire is like a is like a magical text.

A text. Okay.

So like the go if you look up like the Goetia or the Goetia, however you pronounce that. you'll you'll see you'll see you'll see what I'm talking about. like Lesser Key of Solomon. That's that's the one most people are familiar with. But there's all these other ones and there, you know, they have all the you have to do all these purifications. You have to do all of these rituals. You have to do all of this stuff to try to appeal to these spirits or angels or demons or whatever to like do your bidding and there are all these things that you have to do. It's like a very

Very intensive process. But there's this one in particular that's so interesting. I thought I thought it'd be interesting to you called the Ars Notoria.

Yeah. which claims to be of this Solomonic lineage and it claims to be the way that Solomon gained because he supposedly knew all like all the worldly knowledge or something like that and yeah so so anyway it's it's just super super interesting but essentially what's supposed to be happening with this text is there's a few different things and I'm not an expert in this I was just listening to something and looking at some images the other day but so for one the mechanism that's supposed to be happening is you're there are supposed to be like angelic intelligences that just give you information basically, but there are also these charts like the these pictographic charts with like words and images in them.

I'll flash them up on the screen and you're supposed to read those. And I don't know if there's literal information that you're memorizing in those charts about stuff or if it's supposed to be part of like the appeal to these angelic intelligences. I don't know. But I

Figured it would be interesting for you to like to potentially at least do a shallow dive on just because it is another one of these things from, you know, the annals of history that is supposedly a way to gain like superhuman cognitive

Knowledge and memory capacities. It's

Nelson Dellis
[01:41:20]

谢谢你分享。我还没机会深入看,但第一印象是,这些就是古代人用来记忆的策略。过去人们最想记住的是经文、天使遗物,或者与更高信仰相关的东西。我们记忆运动员也使用的最佳技术之一,就是把视觉图像放进地点。我们使用记忆宫殿,想象自己的家或常去地点,把要记的内容变成图像,沿路线散布其中。回忆时,就在脑中走回那个地方。

在心里走过家很容易,然后按顺序拾起与所记内容相关的图像。几千年前,他们确实会用真实建筑,所以叫记忆宫殿。我没有宫殿,只能用房子或以前住的公寓;那时用记忆术的人可能有宫殿。但它不一定严格是实体结构。有一些关于记忆宫殿的报告,说它们曾是实际存在的东西,地点在……

几千年前澳大利亚原住民部落。他们会把标记放在木板上,比如贝壳、石头之类,按特定图案排列,再为每个标记想象图像,帮助记住文化中的故事线、传统。所以你其实得到了一块记忆板。你看那个东西,故事就在上面。表面看不出,但每个标记都附着帮助记忆的视觉图像。所以当你发给我那些带文字的艺术卷轴时,我不惊讶。它也许有太多层编码。首先文字本身可能很重要;文字在这些形状和纸面上的排列方式也很重要。再说一次,我还没深入看,但我猜词语在纸上的位置,可能帮助记住某些东西,比如那些词本身和它们的含义,而且肯定还有别的东西。

No, I was happy you shared that with me. I haven't had a chance to go into it yet, but my first impression was, yeah, these are kind of the ancient ways that strategies that people would use to memorize things. you know, the most important things that people would want to memorize back in the day were, you know, scriptures and angelic relics or or things related to you know, the these higher beliefs.

And one of the best ways, one of the techniques that even we use, memory athletes, has to do with placing visuals for things in locations. we use memory palaces where we can visualize you know, our homes or places we frequent a lot and imagine pictures for things we're memorizing strewn about along a route through this place. And then when we want to recall it, we can mentally walk back through that place.

You know, it's easy to walk through your home in your mind and pick up the images that related to the things that you memorized in order. And back in the day, thousands of years ago, the version of that, they did use actual structures like memory palace, hence the name. I don't have a palace, but I use my house or an apartment I used to live in, but back then they probably had palaces, or the people using them had palaces, but it didn't it wasn't strictly physical structures. There's reports of memory palaces that were actual things in

Aboriginal tribes thousands of years ago. They had these things where they would actually put markers on a board shells rocks, whatever in a certain pattern and they would imagine images to help them remember storylines and traditions for their culture attached to this board. So you effectively had a pneummonic board. you would look at this thing and there's the story. It doesn't look like it, but attached to each one is a visual that helps you remember it.

So, when I saw what you sent me, you know, these are kind of artistic scrolls or whatever with text on them, I wasn't surprised is like this has probably so many layers of encoding. First of all, the actual text, which probably has some importance. how it's placed in this pattern on these shapes on this piece of paper, right? so again, I haven't dived too deep yet, but I would imagine that the locations of where those words are on the paper probably served as a way to help remember certain things

About the actual words and what they mean and I'm sure other things as well.

Michael Phillip
[01:44:17]

有道理。即使我们完全猜错,我确信这些东西确有秘传起源。因为焦尔达诺·布鲁诺就与这些记忆技术密切相关。他像赫尔墨斯主义哲学家,也像某种科学家,很难概括。他是个极有趣、极聪明的角色,最后因为异端思想太过激进,被天主教会处死。

对了,那本书叫什么?

哦,对,弗朗西丝·叶茨(Frances Yates)。她写的《Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition》。

那是经典。他使用古代形式来做今天类似的事。谈到古代记忆技术,一定会提到他。

对。那你给我们讲讲这些东西,让大家明白我们在说什么,以及它的威力。

而且我们甚至还没提到你能做到哪些壮举。对我和所有听众来说,有些事听起来根本不可能,但你真的做到了。我想说里面没有花招,不过也许可以说有某种……

你可以叫它技巧,但最终你确实记住了东西,那算花招吗?谁在乎。你能够……

你记住了一万位圆周率。对。你还完成过哪些大项目?

That makes sense. And even if we're totally wrong about this, I know for sure all of this stuff actually does have some pretty esoteric origins because Giordano Bruno is one of the people who's closely associated with a lot of these memory techniques, right? And this guy this was like a hermetic god philosopher like na kind of scientist. I mean, it's it's hard to even encapsulate him, but he's such he's an incredibly interesting, incredibly brilliant figure who was ultimately actually killed by the Catholic Church for being too crazy a heretic.

But but yeah, there's what is that book?

Oh yeah, Yates. Yeah, Giordano Bruno and the hermetic tradition. Yeah,

It's a classic. yeah, he had some I mean he's using the ancient forms of what we use today. and yeah, he's one of the the names you bring up when you're talking about ancient memory techniques.

Yeah. So, so yeah, run us through some of this stuff so people know exactly what we're talking about and the sort of power

Of doing this and before we haven't even said like some what some of these feats that you can do are there are things that sound to people like me and to everyone listening like it literally must not be possible but you've you've done these things and it's not and there's I would say there's no trick involved but I guess there there's there's kind of a

It's you can call it but in the end you remember something so is it a trick? Who cares, right? Like you're able to

You've memorized 10,000 digits of pi. You've Yeah. What are some of what were some of the big projects

Nelson Dellis
[01:45:55]

在记忆比赛里做过一些,有些仍是纪录,有些已经被远远打破。我曾在比赛中 40 秒记住一副牌,那保持了一段时间美国纪录。我在 15 分钟里记住 235 个姓名和面孔。我还试过一小时记 20 副牌,最终成绩大概是 15 副半。还有半小时约 970 位数字,接近一个千位数。

In memory competition? Some of the things I've done. and some are still records. Some have been blown out of the water, but I was able to memorize a deck of cards in competition in 40 seconds. that was a US record for a while. I memorized 235 names in 15 minutes. Names and faces. I memorize I think I tr tried for 20 packs of cards in an hour. I think my end up my final score was like 15 and a half. but what else? About 97 digits in a half an hour. So almost a thousand digit number.

Nelson Dellis
[01:46:36]

五分钟比赛纪录大概是 339 位数字。刚起步时我做不到这些。如果看别人做,我会觉得不可能。之后还有一万位圆周率。我背过整份报纸,记过满场观众的名字,各种疯狂的东西。但它就是练习,基于我们之前说的视觉化。我要把想记的信息编码成能看见的东西,这往往就是关键。数字和牌,我看到的不是数字或牌,而是关联的图像。你给我一个三位数试试。

Yeah. And in five minutes 300 and what was my record? 39 digits in 5 minutes was my competition record. So stuff that's, you know, when I first started, I could not do that. And if I saw someone do that, I'd be like, that's impossible. but and then yeah, the 10,000 digits of pi. yeah, I've memorized whole newspaper. I've memorized an audience full of people's names.

All sorts of crazy stuff. but yeah, it's it's just a practice, you know. it's based off of visualization, as we mentioned before. How do I take this information that I'm trying to memorize and encode it such that I can visualize it? That's often times the trick. It's like how to do that. Well, for numbers, for example, or cards, I visualize. I don't see the numbers. I don't see the cards. I see pictures that I've associated to the cards and the numbers. So, you know, I see the number I don't know. Give me a three-digit number.

Nelson Dellis
[01:47:46]

441。所有 41 都与我父亲相关,是他人生中的角色、家人等等。所以 441 是我的一位特定表亲。我看到或听到 441,就会想到那个人,而不是三个抽象数字,这比抽象信息容易记太多。我们更容易记住图像,因为图像能唤起所有感觉和情绪,而情绪和感官正是记忆的抓手。下一步是:有了图像之后怎么办?一个图像还好,如果有一长串呢?那就要在脑中组织。最常见策略是记忆宫殿,因为你把这些想要编码的图像……

记住,并放在心智中已经固定的地方。记忆宫殿是你熟悉的地方,比如家或办公室,不需要额外记,它已经在那里。所有技术都在搭已知信息的便车,把新东西锚定到旧东西上。这样要找新信息时,它挂在旧信息旁边。我认为人类学习通常也是这样:当新概念、新词能与已知内容建立联系,它才会咔哒一下被理解。好老师会用精彩比喻解释复杂内容。理查德·费曼就是出色的讲师,很大原因就是他能把最复杂的东西讲得易懂、可联系。联系发生时,学习就发生了。记忆技术本质上也是如此,只是需要更多练习。

441. Okay. So, all the 41s are people related to my my father. All right. So, characters in his life, his his family. So, 441 is a specific cousin of mine. and so I when I see 441 or hear it, I think of that person rather than the actual three digits together. And that is a lot easier to remember than these abstract pieces of information. We remember things in the form of pictures better. Why? Because pictures can evoke all the sensations, emotional charge. and those are the things that we remember, things that are emotionally charged and tap into the senses.

The next part to the technique is like, well, what do you do with those, right? One, imagining one thing is great, but what if you have a whole series or sequence of things? Well, then it comes down to organizing them in your mind. And the most common strategy to do that is a memory palace because you're going to take all these pictures that you're trying to encode, right, and

And remember, and place them somewhere that is already fixed in your mind. And a memory palace, a place that you know well, like your house or your office or whatever, is something you don't need to memorize. It's already there, you know, and all these techniques are doing is piggybacking off of the stuff that you already know. which is just anchoring this new thing to the old thing. So that when you want to go find the new thing, it's attached to the old thing. which in general I think is how we try to learn anything is there's things that we know in our knowledge set and then when something new comes along a new concept a new word whatever and you're like I don't you know it feels foreign it feels on the outside but when you can relate it to something you know that's when it clicks that's when you learn it that's when you understand it you know so that's why you have a good teacher who can make great metaphor, of course, right, for something complicated Richard Feynman was an

Amazing lecturer teacher and largely for that reason he could take the most complicated things and explain them in ways that people would understand that were relatable and when you do that's when learning happens so I think people understand that concept and that's effectively what memory techniques are but with a bit more practice and yeah

07

购物清单与一万位圆周率The Grocery List and 10,000 Digits of Pi

01:50:14 – 01:58:12

Michael Phillip
[01:50:14]

你有没有时间带我们做一两个练习?

Yeah, do you have time to take through one or two things.

Nelson Dellis
[01:50:18]

可以。你想做什么?

Yeah. What What do you want

Michael Phillip
[01:50:20]

教一个完全没接触过的新学生时,你通常怎么开始?

How do you How do you normally start with someone when you're teaching a new student who's never done this?

Nelson Dellis
[01:50:25]

记忆术最好的地方是所有人都能做。我可以带完全的新手做一个例子,他们马上就能完成。这通常让人很受启发,因为多数人以为自己记性差,做不了,结果一下就做到了,还不知道怎么做到的。之后需要练习才能更快,并针对不同信息学习不同策略。但我可以做个简单例子。假设你有购物清单,很常见。你可以写下来,但假设这个世界里你不想用手机,清单上有五样东西。

第一样是西兰花。你会怎么做?先想象西兰花,很容易,脑中浮现绿色花球。但正如我之前说的,不只是视觉,要调动所有感官,加上情绪和运动。情绪常常可以通过夸张、荒诞甚至带点性意味的图像激发。

利用荒诞感通常会唤起情绪。所以我可能会想象一个真人大小的西兰花,满嘴脏话,像个纽约人。

Yeah. The nice thing about memory techniques is like everybody can do it. You know, I can walk the newbie noobs through an example and they can do it. which is often very illuminating for the person because they're like most people think that they have a bad memory they won't be able to do it and voila they just did it and they don't know how you know but then you know you got to practice to get faster and learn different strategies to do it for different kinds of information but yeah I can do a little example you know let's say you had a grocery list very common scenario yes you could write it down. But let's say in this world you're trying to not use your phone. and there's five things on your list.

Okay? So let's say the first thing on your list is broccoli. Okay. What would you do? Well, okay, you want to visualize broccoli. Easy enough. There's that green sprout maybe in your mind. but as I mentioned before, it's not just what you see. It's all the senses, right? Coming together and making some kind of visual for it. emotionally with movement. So, and often the emotional things they will sprout out if you make your image exaggerated, over-the-top sexual

Protest, you know? So, like tapping into kind of like the absurdity of it all will typically evoke some kind of emotional response. So, that's where I tried to go. So, I might picture not just any old broccoli, but like a life-size, you know, human-sized broccoli stalk that's just like foulmouthed. I don't know, like from New York, like

Michael Phillip
[01:52:10]

当然。

Yeah, sure.

Nelson Dellis
[01:52:10]

什么都行,不需要理由,只要更难忘。我要记五样东西,就把它们放到家里。第一样可以放在前门台阶。我进门时,那棵巨大的脏话西兰花臭烘烘地站在门口,说:“怎么了,兄弟?哥们?”

之类的话。然后你走进房子,这是下一步,继续想象第二样东西。比如要买鸡蛋。于是在客厅里,想象整个房间被人扔满了鸡蛋,成千上万个鸡蛋砸在墙上,蛋壳裂开,蛋液和蛋清从屋顶、天花板、墙壁各个角落往下滴,屋里全是蛋味,你甚至滑倒,摔在更多鸡蛋上。然后你向左走进客厅,再放下一幅图像。比如要买华夫饼。也许沙发就是一块巨大的华夫饼,能看到格子。

闻起来很香,糖浆从上面滴下来,坐上去非常舒服。就是一张巨大的华夫饼沙发。接着去厨房,打开冰箱,下一件东西在那里。比如要买电池。你打开冰箱,里面全是电池,各种大小,小的、大的,有的像可乐罐,有的像水果蔬菜,但全是金霸王电池,经典的黑橙配色,只是尺寸不同,全塞在冰箱里。最后,走出厨房,后门通往院子,最后要记的是卫生纸。你可以弄得越粗俗越好。也许院子里有一大坨粪便,被

You know, like whatever. It doesn't even have to have any reason for it, but that's more memorable. I'm trying to memorize these five items, so I'm going to place them in my house. I would imagine maybe on the front doorstep where I might enter my home, there's that big stalk of broccoli with a foul mouth, stinky, opening the door, and he's like, "What's going on,

Bro? Bro, you know,

Something like that." And then you in your mind, you walk into the house, that's the next thing you would do. And you would visualize the next item. So, let's say, I don't know, you got to get some eggs, you know. Okay, so in your living room somehow, maybe just imagine it being egged, you know, like

Thousands of eggs have been pelted all along the walls. There's eggs cracking, shells cracking, eggs and yolk and egg whites dripping from every angle and corner of the roof, the ceiling, the walls, whatever. And it smells very eggy in there. maybe even slip and land on more eggs, you know. Then maybe you take a left and there's your living room. You walk into your living room and you place the next image there.

I don't know, let's say you got to get waffles or something like that. so maybe the couch is made of like a of a big waffle. You know, you can see the grid there.

Maybe it smells delicious. Maybe there's some syrup dripping off of it. You know, it's very comfy when you sit into it. It's just like this big waffle couch, you know. and then maybe next to the living room, you go into the kitchen and you open up the fridge and the next thing is there. Maybe you needed to get some batteries, you know, and you open up the fridge and it's just a fridge filled with batteries, you know, all different sizes, like little ones, big ones, in the shape of Coke cans, in the shape of fruits and vegetables, but just Duracell batteries, you know, like the typical black and orange tube, you know, but in different sizes, all inside your fridge.

And then finally, let's say you go out after the kitchen, there's a doorway to go outside your backyard. Okay? And the last thing you need to remember is toilet paper, right? So, who knows? You can make it as vulgar as you want. Maybe there's just like a big pile of crap and it's just like covered.

Michael Phillip
[01:54:34]

对。然后有人把卫生纸和鸡蛋扔得到处都是。

像回到高中。

Yeah. And somebody is just like, you got toilet papered and egged.

It's like high school all over again.

Nelson Dellis
[01:54:42]

对。然后你去超市,只用这张清单,五样东西不算多,但你可以轻松扩展到更多。你在货架间站着,对自己说:回到我家,我把清单放在那儿。前门是什么?西兰花,大西兰花。很容易。然后呢?进屋,哦,是滴水的鸡蛋,你还摔在鸡蛋上。鸡蛋。走进客厅,坐上沙发,哦,舒服的华夫饼。

再打开冰箱,里面全是电池。然后走到外面,那一大坨粪便上盖满卫生纸。清单就出来了。还能正着、倒着说。反向走一遍,就是卫生纸、西兰花、华夫饼、鸡蛋,还有西兰花。

Yeah. So, you go to the grocery store. just memorized this list with I know it's five things. It's not a big deal, but you can extrapolate this to many, many more without much effort. But in your mind, you're standing there in the grocery aisles and you say to yourself, okay, go to my house. That's where I stored this list. What was in my front door? Broccoli. The big broccoli, right? Like it's there.

It's like easy, you know? Then what do you do? You walk into the house and oh, that's when all the drippy eggs and you fell on an egg. Eggs, right? You walk into the living room, sit on the couch. Oh yeah, that cozy waffle, right?

Into the fridge, right? Open it up, filled with batteries, right? And then you go outside, there's that big pile of [ __ ] with

TP all over it, right? And there you go. There's your list. And you can say that forwards and backwards. If I just navigate that in reverse, I got the toilet paper, the broccoli, the waffle, the eggs, and the the broccoli, you know.

Michael Phillip
[01:55:38]

对。你说了两遍西兰花。

Yeah. You said broccoli twice.

Nelson Dellis
[01:55:40]

抱歉。就是卫生纸、电池,然后是那个 B 开头的词,我一下卡住了,还有华夫饼、西兰花。

Yeah. Sorry. So, so the TP, the batteries I think the B word. that tripped me up. But the waffles, the broccoli,

Michael Phillip
[01:55:50]

对。

Right? Yep.

Nelson Dellis
[01:55:51]

如果问你第三样,你会说,哦,前门、玄关、客厅是华夫饼。

嗯。

对,就是这样。

I could say what's the third item you'd just be like, "Oh, front door entryway living room was waffle, you know."

[filler removed]

Yeah. Yeah, that's how it goes.

Michael Phillip
[01:56:00]

大家能理解这个。但一万位圆周率,我实在无法想象怎么做。流程是什么?就是这一套但极其高效,还是完全不同的东西?

So, yeah, I think everybody can wrap their mind around that. But I think where people can I truly cannot conceive how you could do that with 10,000 digits of pi like like what is the what is the process like? Is it just that but really like but much more efficient or like what what are you doing to be able to do that?

Nelson Dellis
[01:56:21]

首先,我需要更大的记忆宫殿,也需要编码数字的策略。我有数字记忆系统,能把特定数字块转换。我的做法是五个数字一组,每五个数字对应一幅图。这样记忆宫殿需要 2000 个位置,2000 乘 5 就是一万位。2000 个位置太疯狂了。所以我想,把它拆成 10 个各有 200 个位置的记忆宫殿,比较可行。我决定用自己长大的迈阿密整座城市,每个宫殿是一个社区:高中附近、小时候住的房子、商场、某年夏天住的海边度假屋等等。然后沿途为数字的视觉表示编造图像。听起来仍很难,确实花了很多时间,但当我已知道每个数字的图像后,只要想象它们与环境互动,过程就简单了。

只需要想象它们和环境互动。

Yeah. Well, it's first I need a bigger memory palace. and I need a strategy of how I'm going to encode the numbers. I have a system for memorizing numbers where I can convert them certain chunks of them. And the way I decided to do it was in groups of five. so

Every five digits is a picture. so if that's the case then my memory palace needs to have 2,000 locations, right? 2,000* 5, that's 10,000 digits. which 2,000 locations is insane. Yeah. So in my mind I was like okay what if I broke it down to 10 memory palaces of 200 locations a little more manageable and the way I approached it is I said I'm going to just use my whole city where I was from Miami and just each of the 10 will be a neighborhood.

One will be like my high school area one will be you know where the house that we grew up in. Another one will be the mall. Another one will be like the vacation house we stayed in one summer on a beach off to the side of Miami and so on. And yeah, it's just coming up with a picture and imagining these different representations of numbers along the way. And I know it still sounds hard. and believe me, it took time. but it's an easy process when I already know the images for the numbers and I

Just imagine them interacting with the environment.

Michael Phillip
[01:57:47]

所以你现在默认就是这样与信息互动?你只是……

So, is this just how you interact with information now kind of by default? You just like

Michael Phillip
[01:57:53]

我们之前一起参加了大概几天 Probably Nothing 巡演。你走进一个新地方,比如剧院,会不会自动开始把地点变成宫殿?会不会注意到东西,说:“哦,这个可以用来记那个?”你一直都在这样做吗?

Like do you So, so we were on this probably nothing tour together for a couple of days. When you like walk into a new place like one of those theaters, does your mind start just like doing that with the location? Do you just start noticing things and being like, "Oh, I could use this as a palace for that." And like like is that what you're doing kind of all the time?

08

记忆的未来与结尾The Future of Memory and Closing

01:58:12 – 02:02:22

Nelson Dellis
[01:58:12]

一直是。倒不是我会刻意这么做,而是经过这么多年练习,我自然而然就会那样想。我觉得我的大脑就是这么运作的。我看到一个空间,已经会开始把它编目,并改造成未来可以用来储存信息的装置。看到广告牌上的数字,或者有人告诉我一个数字,我不可避免地只看到它们对应的画面,而不是数字本身。现在很多数字对我而言都像一个具体的东西,会激起情绪反应,因为它们代表别的东西,感觉也像别的东西,我可能喜欢、讨厌、被它们唤起,或者被它们吓到。

All the time. And it's not like I'm going to do that. I tell No, it's just I think from so many years of practice and naturally think that way. I think that's just what my brain does. Like I look at spaces and I'm kind of already starting to catalog them and retrofit them to something that I could use as a future storage device. and you know, when I see a billboard with a number on it or somebody tells me a number, I inevitably I'm actually just seeing it as the visuals, not the actual information. you know, a lot of these numbers now are feel like a thing and have an emotional response for me because they are something else and they feel like something else and I love them or hate them or get aroused by them or I'm scared by them, you know.

Michael Phillip
[01:59:02]

数字会让你兴奋?

You get aroused by numbers

Nelson Dellis
[01:59:05]

有些会。

Some Yeah.

Michael Phillip
[01:59:06]

老兄,最性感的数字是什么?

What's the hottest number,

Nelson Dellis
[01:59:08]

我妻子,593。

Dude? My wife 593,

Michael Phillip
[01:59:10]

当然。

Of course.

Michael Phillip
[01:59:11]

太好笑了,兄弟,太好笑了。是的,老兄。我觉得有件事特别令人难过,就是我们绝对应该把这种方法教给所有人。哦,我又把你弄丢了吗?

老兄,为什么我们不把这种方法教给所有孩子?我确定你会教自己的孩子,但我回想学校里那些我根本不感兴趣的信息,作为一个接近 ADD 的人,我觉得自己原本不必用那些方式受苦,只是没有掌握整理思绪所需的技巧,你知道吗?让我难以置信的是,这些方法我们已经知道几千年了,却不用。我们不教孩子,不教他们如何用这样的技巧掌控自己的心智和念头。我就是不明白。

That's so funny. That's so funny, man. yeah, dude. It's just one of the things is that I think is so sad about this is that we absolutely should be teaching this to everyone. Oh, did I lose you again?

Why aren't we all teaching kids this, man? Like I'm sure you teach it to your kids, but like when I think back to school and struggling with information that just was not interesting to me, you know, as a borderline ADD person, like

I think I just struggled in ways I didn't need to struggle because I just didn't have the techniques I needed to wrangle my mind,

You know? And it's just my it's it's unbelievable to me that we've known this [ __ ] for thousands of years and we don't use it. Like we don't teach it to kids. We don't teach kids how to get control of their mind and their thoughts with techniques like this. I just don't understand.

Nelson Dellis
[01:59:59]

我也不明白。这很令人沮丧。我试过和学校系统、不同机构合作。乍一看,他们都觉得这太棒了,必须让孩子们学会。但一到官僚体系那一层,我就撞上墙,因为它违背课程设置,违背州里的要求。“学习不是这样进行的,我们不靠记忆。”我一直忍到临界点。很不幸。

Yeah, me neither. It's frustrating. I've I've had experiences trying to work with the school systems and different places and the at first glance I think this is incredible and they got to get it to the kids. But when it comes down to like the bureaucracy like I hit a head and it goes against the curriculum, you know, and the state. This is not how you learn. we don't memorize, you know, like and it's just I've I've I've had it up to here, you know, with with that. It's unfortunate.

Michael Phillip
[02:00:29]

好吧,最后我想说的是,你又要做这件事了。第五次不是终点,第六次也不是。你已经决定再冲一次。

Well, last thing I guess I'll say is you're doing this again. This this the fifth time wasn't the last. The sixth time wasn't the last. You've decided you're going to take another run at this.

Nelson Dellis
[02:00:38]

是的。其实我没告诉你,我参赛了,就在两个周末前。我没有赢。

我得了第二名。

I did. So, I didn't tell you, but I competed. It was two weekends ago. I did not win. Damn.

I came in second.

Michael Phillip
[02:00:44]

哦,那也很不错。

Oh, well, come out.

Nelson Dellis
[02:00:46]

是的。那是我和一位 2019 年前冠军之间的对决。他牌记得特别厉害。他从阴影里出来了。他非常安静、内向,所以没人知道他在做什么、去了哪里,而他决定参赛。那几乎是 2019 年的重演,最后我和他来回背诵牌。他很强,很难打败。所以那次他又赢了我。但我对此很高兴。我最近没怎么练习,只是一时兴起决定参赛,我仍然觉得表现很好,而且是的,考虑到这些,我宝刀未老。所以很棒。

Yeah. It was it was a showdown between me and a former champ from 2019. He's amazing at cards. He came out of the shadows. He's a very quiet, keeps-to-himself guy. So I nobody knew what he was doing, where he's been, and he decided to compete. And it was almost a repeat of 2019, me and him at the end going back and forth reciting cards. And he's tough to beat. So he got me that time again. but I was happy with it. I hadn't been practicing much and decided on a whim to compete and I still think that I performed really well and

Yeah, I still got it considering. So, it was great.

Michael Phillip
[02:01:26]

兄弟,你真是个鼓舞人心、独特又聪明的人,让我觉得自己在认知上简直像个小啾啾。老实说,我就是不——

Dude, you're such an inspiring, unique, brilliant person who just makes me feel like I have such an a cognitive micro penis, honestly. Like, I just don't

Nelson Dellis
[02:01:38]

不不,真的很正常,兄弟。我有时候听你说话,会想:“天啊,我连把你说的话表达出来的词都找不到。”所以我觉得各有所长。你能做我做不到的事,我也能做你做不到的事。

No, no, it's it's so true, man. I hear you talk sometimes and I'm like, man, I don't even know the words to say what you're saying. So, I think to each their own. You can do things I can't do and vice versa.

Michael Phillip
[02:01:51]

你太客气了,太客气了。兄弟,谢谢你来做客。有这么多不可思议的故事和成就,希望我们很快能再见面。

You're you're too kind. You're too kind. Well, dude, thanks for coming on. So many incredible stories and accomplishments and hopefully we get to we get to hang in person again soon.

Nelson Dellis
[02:02:01]

我也希望,兄弟。谢谢你让我分享这些故事。我没有太多平台能舒服地讲这些而不被评判,在节目里。

Yeah, I hope so, man. Thanks for allowing me to share those stories. I don't have too many platforms where I can comfortably share it without being judged

Through my show.

Michael Phillip
[02:02:12]

不,兄弟。是的。相信我,你远不是这档节目出现过最离奇的东西,所以你安全。

No, dude. Yeah. Believe me, you're you're far from the most out there thing that's been on the show, so you're safe. Yeah.

Nelson Dellis
[02:02:21]

谢谢,兄弟。

Thanks, brother.

Michael Phillip
[02:02:22]

太好了。保重。

Awesome. Take care.

没有符合当前筛选条件的内容。

原字幕校正记录

原始字幕完整保留在 source.segments.tsv;以下是翻译前依据上下文所做的重要校正。

人名、机构与专有名词

时间 原字幕 校正为 依据
00:03:50、00:04:05 Chris Ramsey Chris Ramsay 上下文指魔术师、内容创作者克里斯·拉姆齐
00:05:45、00:23:12 Joseph McMagle / Joe McMongle Joe McMoneagle 纪录片片段、访谈主题与星门计划公开资料
00:18:24、00:19:07、00:23:12 SRRI Stanford Research Institute / SRI 同一段随后明确读出机构全称
00:18:24 Ingo Swan Ingo Swann 遥视史中的标准拼写
00:18:24、00:22:17 Hal Putoff / Hal put off Hal Puthoff 研究者标准拼写及上下文
00:18:24、00:22:17 Russell Tar Russell Targ 研究者标准拼写及上下文
00:20:27、00:21:48 Andrea Puharic / Puharic Andrija Puharich 《Phenomena》相关人物与上下文
00:20:41 Greg Malloi 保留 Greg Malloi,未确认对应人物 缺少足够公开上下文,未强行改成具体姓名
00:21:59、00:22:17 Eureller / Erie Geller Uri Geller 同一段与 Puharich、Targ、Puthoff 合作的语境
00:44:53 Angela Ford Angela Dellafiora [可能为:安吉拉·德拉菲奥拉] 星门计划遥视员身份与可能替代姓名,保留不确定性
00:57:24、00:57:47、00:59:28 Syame / Sai games SI Games 同一活动的重复称呼;未能进一步确认全称
01:38:42、01:39:56、01:40:04 RS Notori / Ars Notori Ars Notoria 中世纪魔法文本名称
01:39:22 Goateea / Goata Goetia 西方秘传传统术语
01:44:17、01:44:59 Girrodono Bruno / Gordon Bruno Giordano Bruno 文艺复兴哲学家标准拼写
01:44:59 Yates / Gordon Bruno and the hermetic tradition Frances Yates / Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition 作者、书名与上下文
01:48:50 Richard Fineman Richard Feynman 理论物理学家标准拼写

品牌、网址与术语

时间 原字幕 校正为 依据
00:03:13 pneummonica stack mnemonic stack 魔术牌序与记忆术语境
00:26:51 patreon.com/therrops;patronon Discord patreon.com/thirdeyedrops;Patreon Discord 视频简介中的官方赞助链接及同一段后续拼写
00:41:10、01:18:32 onlogically ontologically 发音及“重新定位世界观”的语境
00:46:28 aggregor egregore 秘传思想中的群体思想体概念
01:23:47 Iaska retreats ayahuasca retreats [可能为:死藤水静修] 发音、静修语境与后文迷幻体验描述
01:33:34 Pavo response Pavlovian response 播放双耳节拍后自动进入特定状态的语境

说话人拆分与归属

时间 原字幕情况 校正为 依据
01:45:18、01:45:25 自动字幕未标说话人,并可能把主持人的转场与追问接在嘉宾发言之后 明确为 主持人|Michael Phillip;01:45:25 单独拆分主持人继续引导嘉宾谈记忆壮举 前后问答对象与“you've memorized 10,000 digits of pi”等呼语
01:42:58、01:44:12、01:48:50 原字幕把一个连续思想切成时间戳片段,上一段以连接词结尾 将跨时间戳句子按语义续接并拆分段落,内容不删减 保留全部源时间戳,改善中文阅读节奏
01:59:02–02:02:22 结尾多轮短句和重叠发言缺少说话人区分 按问答内容分别标为主持人与嘉宾,并保留最后两个相同时间戳的先后顺序 上下文回应关系与结尾固定流程